Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top 10 Reasons Why The Patriots Will Winn The Super Bowl
CNN-SI ^ | 1-27-02 | vanity (of course)

Posted on 01/27/2002 6:02:43 PM PST by paul in cape

10. They will be huge underdogs (see Pittsburgh)

9. Georgia Frantiere is already getting measured for her huge rings (see also Bill Cowher ordering Hotel rooms for New Orleans)

8. The last game they lost (and barely) was against St. Louis, back when Brady was still green

7. Coach Belichick is coaching his arse off, and can game plan against anybody.

6. During their 8-game run, they shut down the top running backs in the league Curtis Martin, Edgerine James, Jerome Bettis (etc)

5. St Louis will now have to prepare a gameplan against 2 Pro-Bowl quarterbacks

4. Patriot cornerbacks have shut down every Hall-Of-Fame bound recievers (Rice and Brown, plus those whiners in Pittsburgh)

3. They've dominated every game on special teams, and make big plays

2. They have few, if any, stars. What they have is discipline, like the Marines

Which brings me to my #1 reason why they'll win the Super Bowl....

They're PATRIOTS, and of all years where patriotism has come back in vogue, THIS IS IT


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last
To: paul in cape
Hey, is Michael Bishop still with the Patriots? He was a quarterback at Kansas State a few years back and went to the Pats in a later round. He was never intended, I believe, to be used at q'back, but was such an awesome athlete that they spoke of using him elsewhere.

Anyone know.

I watched him throw a football 70 yards once, perfect spiral, from a flat-footed stand....all arm strength. Fast and slick -- unfortunately not an NFL style q'back. He was a scrambler, option, runner. But he had this desire to win that wouldn't quit; would always figure out a way.

41 posted on 01/28/2002 3:25:45 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul in cape
Sorry--but it will be another freakin BLOWOUT!

After 8 1/2 hours of hype--the Superbowl game will be all but over in 15 minutes, and the people at the parties will start discussing how the commercials last year were so much better.

RAMS 52........................PATS 17

42 posted on 01/28/2002 3:26:15 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: Aquinasfan
Belichek can design a D to stop any offense.

Belichek is great but don't discount the "great Lovie". He coached the 7th greatest turn around of a defense in the history of pro football.

44 posted on 01/28/2002 3:35:37 AM PST by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: baseballfanjm
Marshall Faulk and Kurt Warner are not Jerome Bettis and Kordell Stewart. Too bad I had to point that out.
45 posted on 01/28/2002 3:37:31 AM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: paul in cape
On the record:

Pats 27
Rams 24

In OT.

I have spoken...

46 posted on 01/28/2002 4:10:37 AM PST by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul in cape
Also, IMHO, first time Pats have been there with a real coach.

And by now, after '86, '96, the Pats should know the field pretty well. 8^)

47 posted on 01/28/2002 4:13:51 AM PST by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul in cape
On the battlefield and the playing field, one wins by neutralizing one's opponents strengths and exploiting each and every opportunity.

Does this sound like the Pats?

48 posted on 01/28/2002 4:13:56 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Pathetic comment. You must be a Raiders fan.
49 posted on 01/28/2002 4:14:52 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Iowegian
We are still here, corn-picker.
50 posted on 01/28/2002 4:16:15 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I watched him throw a football 70 yards once, perfect spiral, from a flat-footed stand....all arm strength. Fast and slick -- unfortunately not an NFL style q'back.

The NFL has never liked running QB's like Flutie because they're effective. Although they're finally starting to smarten up with the success of McNabb and Stewart.

The Pats cut him before the start of the season.

51 posted on 01/28/2002 4:26:15 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
That's too bad. He was an awesome athlete. (His desire to win reminded me of Joe Montana.)

Do you know if anyone picked him up?

It's a shame that no one in the NFL will try a pure option offense, wishbone or otherwise. I've always heard the excuse that they just don't believe it'd work at the pro level. Wouldn't you still be bringing the best offensive players against the best defensive players no matter how you ran the offense?

Multiple offenses is why I prefer college football. Multiple defenses is why I prefer college basketball. The greatest sporting event is the NCAA b'ball tourney. Now if the NCAA would just get a clue about a football playoff.

52 posted on 01/28/2002 4:35:23 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Prentice
Rams 24- Pats 17

Now the pressure will mount on Brady
November 19, 2001

FOXBORO - It was a different experience last night for New England's latest Prince Charming, and many sets of eyes were watching to see how he would respond to the new pressure.

Tom Brady came on to replace the injured Drew Bledsoe as the Patriots quarterback eight weeks ago and, unbelievably, led New England from the depths of mediocrity to playoff contention. Playing without a worry, wide-eyed and innocent in the eyes of the fans, Brady has been winging passes to wide receivers and backs with equal aplomb, and has benefited from a resurrected running game and a new defensive resolve.

Before last night, Brady had completed 63.9 percent of his passes and thrown 11 touchdowns. Only five of his passes have been intercepted, and four of those came in the fourth quarter of the Denver game four weeks ago.

All ancient history now. While going 5-2, Brady had no competition. Make a mistake and he knew he would still be back in the huddle. There was the normal, intense pressure on a young quarterback learning the ropes, but not the pressure of knowing an interception could earn him a clipboard, a set of headphones and a view from the sidelines.

After last night's loss to the Rams, Brady is 5-3 (the Patriots are 5-5). He and his offensive mates made some major errors. There was no Brady magic until the Rams went prevent in the fourth quarter and he made them pay with a 10-yard scoring pass to David Patten in the corner of the end zone to cut the St. Louis lead to 24-17.

But before that, the fans had become restless as a conservative offense proved inept, though no calls for Drew were heard in the stands. Even when trying to play with one hand tied behind his back, Brady was no match for the Rams, or the expectations he had created.

Yes, Brady completed 19 passes in 27 attempts. But only for 185 yards and he had two more interceptions. Yes, he was done in by the slippery hands of Kevin Faulk and Antowain Smith. Faulk saw a pass bounce off his hands for an interception, setting up the Rams first touchdown. Smith's late second-quarter fumble at the Rams 3 not only cost the Patriots a score, but the lead when the Rams followed with a 97-yard drive in just one minute, 41 seconds.

As the Rams and quarterback Kurt Warner spread the ball around the field, throwing for more than 400 yards, Brady suddenly looked like this year's early-season version of Drew Bledsoe. The Patriot offense suddenly looked like the one Bledsoe had to play with in the first two games.

Last night was the beginning of Brady's new reality: Bledsoe was armed and ready, medically cleared to play. He was itching to get back on the field and take what he feels is his rightful place as head man on this football team, as he has for nine years now. It wasn't only ESPN's Joe Theismann and Paul Maguire who were wondering if Brady would be looking over his shoulder if things didn't go his way. Pats head coach Bill Belichick made it a big story last night by making Bledsoe the No. 2 quarterback, though the veteran never took his warm-up jacket off. Next weekend against New Orleans, that may not be the story. Brady has been through this before, battling with Brian Griese and Drew Henson for playing time at Michigan. He's done what many thought was impossible - making this Patriots' team a playoff contender - and his reward is not knowing if he'll be on the field next week ... or next series, for that matter.

"It makes no difference to me," he said last week when asked about all the uncertainty of his role that is sure to continue swirling. "Whether a guy's here or not here, that doesn't affect me. It's too much energy worrying about anyone else. There's not enough time in the day. It's enough work trying to prepare myself." Especially last night, against a fleet St. Louis squad many experts pick to win it all. The Rams much-improved defense was ranked fourth overall in the NFL before last night, ninth against the pass. The Patriots kept the game close, but did so with a less-than-sterling offensive effort that could produce only 10 points. The opportunities were there, the touchdowns weren't. Another game like this next Sunday against the Saints, and Bledsoe's return to action will be sooner than fans expected. Ironically, now that Brady has moved the Patriots into contention, the team may not be able to afford his growing pains while a proven quarterback watches and waits.

53 posted on 01/28/2002 4:35:49 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: paul in cape
Because their fans are good spellers?
54 posted on 01/28/2002 4:36:43 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul in cape
this is a political discussion?
55 posted on 01/28/2002 4:43:59 AM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Rams are in all the way~! The offense is magnificent and the defense is amost too good for words. Ask McNabb what it was like trying to get his game on with Wistrom and Little breathing down his jersey not to mention that nice throw he gave to Anneas Williams. Warner and Faulk, Warner and Bruce, Warner and Holt, Warner and Hakim - any of these combinations could beat the Pats with one hand tied behind their backs.
56 posted on 01/28/2002 4:47:23 AM PST by Clintons Are White Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
It's as much a Vanity post as yours were that you made today.

I hope you are kidding.

The last sentence in the original post referred to the thriving of Patriotism and suggested it would be nice to see a group named "Patriot" succeed.

57 posted on 01/28/2002 4:49:35 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash
I hope so. I pulled for the Phins, but once they are out, it is either GB or Rams for me. Win win.
58 posted on 01/28/2002 4:50:17 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: paul in cape
This will be another in a long line of boring Superbowls. The Pats shot their wads beating the Steelers. When they face the Rams they will be spanked badly by a very superior team. Count on it!

GO RAMS!

59 posted on 01/28/2002 4:51:40 AM PST by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul in cape
The key to the game will be the Patriots ability to maintain some form of a ball control offense and keep time of possession relatively even. If they do they will keep it close.

If they don't their defense will tire (like it did against Pittsburgh) and the Rams will pull away in the fourth quarter. Kurt Warner's not going to melt down like Kordelia did.

-Eric

60 posted on 01/28/2002 4:55:47 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson