[arthurus]

It would seem that we were on the wrong side in Bosnia. In retrospect, however, if the US gets serious about defending itself against the resurgence of Mohamedenism, then perhaps it is a good thing politically that we sided with Moslems in that fight. It shows we choose our fights for reasons other than religion.

I use the term "Mohamedenism" because that better describes the phenomenon than does "Islam" or "Moslems". The Islamicists imitate the methods and tactics of the historical Mohamed. The Koran can be analyzed to death and most anything can be found in that largely disconnected fount of "wisdom," but Mohamed acted concretely and barbarically. Even in terms of his own culture. His actions were those of a megalomaniac barbarian chieftain with charisma. The Islamicists have absorbed Mohamed and are not so careful with the spiritual side of that religion.

[Lent]

. In retrospect, however, if the US gets serious about defending itself against the resurgence of Mohamedenism, then perhaps it is a good thing politically that we sided with Moslems in that fight. It shows we choose our fights for reasons other than religion.

There was no moral, legal, or political reasons to support the break-up of a sovereign European country and recognize and help create a Musli state in the heart of Europe. Of course, the Rapist was in charge what can be expected.

[gg188]

You are correct: It would be more accurate to call islam and moslems "mohammedans."