[Ol' Sparky]

If the total energy available in the universe were zero, everything in it would be dead. If available energy in the universe were zero, everything in it would be dead. The second law of thermodyanmics clearly states that there is available energy and is decreasing. Available energy is necessary for life.

If Evolution is true, there must be an extremely powerful force or mechanism at work in the cosmos that can steadily defeat the powerful, ultimate tendency toward "disarrangedness" brought by the 2nd Law. If such an important force or mechanism is in existence, it would seem it should be quite obvious to all scientists. Yet, the fact is, no such force of nature has been found.

[longshadow]

If the total energy available in the universe were zero, everything in it would be dead. If available energy in the universe were zero, everything in it would be dead. [snip]

Total energy, as in NET total energy, can be zero AND can still provide positive energy for naturally occurring thermodynamic processes. Think about it it.

If Evolution is true, there must be an extremely powerful force or mechanism at work in the cosmos that can steadily defeat the powerful, ultimate tendency toward "disarrangedness" brought by the 2nd Law. If such an important force or mechanism is in existence, it would seem it should be quite obvious to all scientists. Yet, the fact is, no such force of nature has been found.

You ignored what I said regarding the 2LoT. I repeat: there is nothing in the 2nd Law that precludes local decreases in entropy as long as the total entropy of the system and its environment experiences a net increase.

Ignoring my point and repeating your assertion that Evolution somehow violates the 2LoT doesn't make it true.