Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
You've yet to make a point proving this lame theory. Let alone refuted the massive holes in it. Unlike Stephen J. Gould, who has the intellectual sense to admit that evolution is a theory with holes in it and Darwin's gradualism is likely impossible, you babble on as if evolution is anywhere near being a fact.
427 posted on 02/02/2002 3:07:01 PM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky
You've yet to make a point proving this lame theory. Let alone refuted the massive holes in it. Unlike Stephen J. Gould, who has the intellectual sense to admit that evolution is a theory with holes in it and Darwin's gradualism is likely impossible, you babble on as if evolution is anywhere near being a fact.

(Snort!) I took you out every time. Your Gould-ian quote-mining sillies were exposed by ThinkPlease at least twice. You cannot have failed to notice, but you brazen on.

431 posted on 02/02/2002 4:11:19 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson