Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jorsett
What are the statues going to look like with their new "clothes"? Seems excessive to me, but as you say, its just taking the "lets not display anything which will offend anybody" idea to its logical conclusion.
4 posted on 01/26/2002 10:14:53 AM PST by Youngblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Youngblood
get over it. he didn't ask for them to be removed. the man has a right to his own opinion and to follow his conscience. I wish you lefties would get over your control issues.
7 posted on 01/26/2002 10:25:06 AM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Youngblood
Well, I guess it's a good thing they weren't planning to host the leaders of Afghanistan--it would have been more expensive to make a full-body drapery for the statues and a beard for the male one; not to mention the changing of the sword of justice for an AK-47 and chiseling off the word "justice". I am sure they wouldn't want to offend anyone.
18 posted on 01/26/2002 10:42:52 AM PST by Great Wombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Youngblood
The problem seems that photographers were deliberately seeking out the titilating overtones, leading to a justified covering up. If they hadn't created the problem, the artwork would remain on display.
19 posted on 01/26/2002 10:49:05 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Youngblood
what are you saying?? Don't you know that boobies are evil? It's for the children, for God's sake!
46 posted on 01/27/2002 9:21:15 AM PST by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson