Sounds like a case of assuring a non-hostile work environment to me. The leftists should be quite happy, assuming that they're consistent.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: John Jorsett
Would this story have seen the light of day without confirmation if it had been a Democrat?
To: John Jorsett
I need help comprehending exactly what it is that is patently evil about a nude statue. Is it the acknowledgement that people are actually naked under their hairshirts that some fear? A standing nude can only be considered obsene by an obsene mind, say I.
Outside the (leased) building of my former employer was a 30' tall rendering of the David. Now, for those of you unfamiliar with the sculpture, David is full-bollocks naked as the day he was born. There was quite a movement formed, primarily by a bunch of women for whom the statue was most likely the closest they would come to a male body, to have the "offensive statue" removed. Seems that it was creating a "hostile environment."
The landlord's response to this herd of bra-burning cows? "Get a life." Really! Heh, heh.
50 posted on
01/28/2002 5:03:26 AM PST by
Neckbone
To: John Jorsett
It's stuff like this that gives the Washington ComPost and the New York Slimes ammunition to portray us as a bunch of nutty rubes. I'm starting to think Ashcroft needs to have his head examined.
52 posted on
01/28/2002 10:09:58 AM PST by
jpl
To: John Jorsett
I am taking CREDIT as the inadvertent inspiration for this story by BEVERLY LUMPKIN. Why? Because on January 21 I posted this
THREAD about how boring Beverly Lumpkin has become. I know she monitors the Free Republic so I am sure she saw my post and decided to spice up her usually dull reports a bit. Glad you have been taking my advice, Beverly. Your story might not have much to do with the job of the Attorney General but at least it is a wee bit interesting. (But is it accurate?)
55 posted on
01/29/2002 4:22:57 PM PST by
PJ-Comix
To: John Jorsett
animated gif-loading
To: John Jorsett;_Jim;krb;youngblood;aculeus;FITZ;RAT Patrol;Arkinsaw;parsifal;aruanan;The Wizard...
64 posted on
02/14/2002 9:04:29 PM PST by
Timesink
To: Timesink
And it turns out that they were indeed ordered by someone in the attorney general's office, who delivered the request to the Justice Management Division and asserted it was the attorney general's desire. Sure enough, there it is. So many articles about it and I missed this one, the key to it all.
Oh well. The photographers are still the main culprits in all of this.
To: John Jorsett
In law, we refer to these as "Revised Statues." -----[if you don't get it, read it again carefully] parsy the high-class punster.
68 posted on
02/15/2002 1:05:12 PM PST by
parsifal
To: John Jorsett
there is a difference between art and gratuitous nudity. guess he doesnt have enough work as it is, but has to play dress up with beautiful, artistic nudes.
71 posted on
04/11/2002 11:51:29 AM PDT by
galt-jw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson