[DCBryan1]

Sirgawain...someone notify the BANG LIST for me!

[DCBryan1]

CRAP! I hit enter before finishing!

Anyway, KHTV reported the wrong numbers. 77/22 vs 95%/5%.

Who can we forward this to for help?

[Lchris]

I don't see how this is a gun control issue really. If the children are young, parents should be held responsible if they leave loaded guns lying around. I believe this, but I'm not in favor of gun control. Children control is more like it :)

[GOPJ]

bump

[Dave S]

Contact KHTV TV and ask why they reported that the 77% Yes/22% NO vote was not what their website reported.

You live there. Why dont you pick up the phone and ask them. Perhaps they have an innocent answer. Are you too lazy to find out or is it just more fun to scream media bias?

In any case, these website surveys are worth a piece of used toilet paper. They have no scientific validity. They can be freeped which means that they probably bare no relationship to what people really think. The big problem is that people decide whether to take the time to participate. Only hard core people on one side or the other is likely to bother.

[chantal7]

When I went to the poll the numbers were:

Should parents be held responsible for harm caused by their children involving family owned guns?

Yes 3.1 %

No 96.9 %

Yet you posted 77% yes/22% no

What gives?

[Marauder]

There's a fairly significant difference between bias and bald-faced lying. This collection of lowlifes can't even be characterized as "leaning" toward the left; they've gone all the way into Pravda mode.

[Djarum]

They probably used the results from around 8pm when they were writing the story. They didn't say they would post the results from any specific time.

[dpwiener]

Just for the historical record, here's a screen shot of the poll results:

[Zon]

Should parents be held responsible for harm caused by their children involving family owned guns?

Should government be held as a criminal co-conspirator when a rape or shooting victim didn't have ready access to a gun because it was locked away per government law?

John Stossel made a powerful point on one of his specials. I don't think I can describe it with near the impact that Stossel did, but here goes anyways...

The FDA held a highly effective life-saving drug off the market despite it being successful used in several European countries. Some kind of bureaucratic red-tape/snafu kept the drug from being available in United States.

Stossel continues, last year seven thousand peopled died from xxxxx. Doesn't that mean that the FDA killed seven thousand Americans last year?

[jrewingjr]

Bump.

[jrewingjr]

Check your Freepmail. You have a letter.

[rockfish59]

it's because they all went to the josef goebbels school of jourrrrrrrnalism!!!

NIGHT ISS DAY!
DAY ISS NIGHT!
ZEIG HEIL!!!

[vannrox]

bump

[Sir Gawain]

ping