[ArGee]

I contend it was wrong for Nellie to do what she did,

And I contend that it was absolutely right. The pro-life cause must be, at its root, a moral cause. It can not succeed if we mix the holy with the profane, as it were.

As to the other, if I agree with you that heterosexual activity is the cause of the spread of AIDS in the rest of the world (citation?) then I would say the heterosexual activity that lead to its spread was indeed immoral and harmful. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that if the rest of the world would keep their sexuality within the context of a monagomous heterosexual marriage, there would be no AIDS epidemic.

Shalom.

[Dimensio]

I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that if the rest of the world would keep their sexuality within the context of a monagomous heterosexual marriage, there would be no AIDS epidemic.

I'm going to go at an even greater limb and suggest that if everyone kept their sexuality in the context of a monagamous relationship -- whether an opposite-sex pairing or same-sex pairing -- there would be no AIDS epidemice.

Some will dispute that, though, insisting that homosexuality actually "causes" AIDS in itself.

[helmsman]

As to the other, if I agree with you that heterosexual activity is the cause of the spread of AIDS in the rest of the world (citation? [World Health Organization - just about any study they've ever released on the matter]) then I would say the heterosexual activity that lead to its spread was indeed immoral and harmful.

I can accept that. Indeed, if human beings could restrict their sexual behavior to monogamous relationships then we would certainly be a healthier society. But that applies as much to homosexuality as it does to heterosexuality.