Posted on 01/22/2002 9:45:45 PM PST by t-shirt
Interpretation of law allows confiscation
MICHAEL A. SAWYERS
January 17, 2002
Cumberland Times-News Staff Writer
CUMBERLAND -- Under the current interpretation by the Maryland attorney general concerning the confiscation of firearms, citizens who had misdemeanor transgressions at any time in the past could have their guns taken, according to Delegate Kevin Kelly.
Such misdemeanors include cheating, defamation of private persons, unlawful assembly, blasphemy, profanity, common scolding, disturbance and disorderly conduct.
"As long as a person could have been sentenced to one year or more in jail, their guns can be confiscated," Kelly said.
"If you actually spent more than a year in jail then you did something bad and I don't want you to have a gun either. But like in Larry's (Dicken) case, two young bucks got into a shoving match and he has been law-abiding ever since then. He should be allowed to have his firearms."
Dicken said he didn't even use guns until after his son graduated from high school in 1998 and he found himself needing something to do.
"My brother hunted and I got into it that way and found that I enjoyed shooting and hunting," Dicken said.
Kelly said his fellow legislators tell similar stories involving their constituents elsewhere in Maryland. His request in October for state police to quantify such confiscations and explain the individual convictions upon which actions were based has gone unanswered.
He is sponsoring a bill that would prevent state officials from enforcing the federal statute that allows confiscation of the weapons. It also would prohibit anyone who was sentenced to a year or more in jail from owning or possessing a gun.
"I'm hopeful that the bill will pass and that I will be able to use the firearms again," Dicken said. "At first I was so upset that I brought in my American flag from out front. I felt like I didn't have any freedom anymore. Then Sept. 11 came and everybody everywhere was buying guns to protect themselves, but I wasn't allowed to protect myself. Now, I've got $5,000 worth of guns I can't use and I paid for a membership at the Fort Hill Rifle Club and I can't shoot. I hope it works out. I really want to go hunting next year."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gun Confiscation & Gun Confiscation Resistence Related Threads:
----------
Connecticut's new gun confiscation law
Breaking:IRS Gun Registation..then...ATF GUN CONFISCATION!....stepByStep
Confiscation of Registered Guns Begins in Illinois
Free Rx's for Seniors and SS disabled = Gun Confiscation.
Criminal Gun Use 'Rose 40% After Ban' (& Confiscation That Britian Carried Out)
FOX News Alert III -AP:Deputy Killed While Trying.. ( Gun Confiscation & Resistence To It Begins)
Deputy killed; standoff ends in blaze (Gun Confiscation Target & Resister Was A Former Cop)
Committee Votes Against Gun-Regulation Bills ("Database Will Lead to..Confiscation of Firearms")
(Feds Destroy-Bulldoze Beck CrimeScene!- Like They did In OK & WACO!) Residents Pick Up the Pieces
Confiscation of Registered Guns Begins in Illinois
Chicago Police esthetic as their CAGE Unit begins gun confiscation without incident
National guards clash with right-wing tax protest movement during gun confiscation attempt.
(Gun Confiscation:"Millions Intentionally Breaking Law") Canadian Gun Law Raises Questions & Hackles
Clinton & Hollywood Rally For Gun Confiscation -Vs- Bill of Rights & Second Amendment Sisters
(GUN)Registration Rush Appears to Slow (Hurry!Go Get Fingerprinted So Later Confiscation Is Easier!)
GUN CONFISCATION WEST AUSTRALIA HAPPENING 4yrsAfter97 Deadline-WhySoLong? OwnerResistence(MyTitle)
Maryland Sheriff Opposes U.S.M.C. House-To-House Confiscation Exercises
GUNOWNERS Urged Turn in GUNS !-Gun Control..to..Gun Confiscation-Step By Step-Will you turn 'em in?
First, Gun Control, Next, Confiscation
Gun Registration & Confiscation Defied
BIG BROTHER SCHOOLS -- GUN CONTROL --THOUGHT CONTROL
The United Nations and Gun Control
Small Arms Win (United Nations Gun-Control Loses & NYTimes MadAsHell At Bush & GunOwners)
And neither will we. A backlash is on its way and they will pay a price.
We must resist gun confiscation to the death when necesaary.
And we need to have that "drilled into our heads" as our sacred oath. Anything less is agreeing to allow ourselves and our families to be defenseless slaves to be murdered at will by the government or any tyrant or criminal who comes along.
Great point!
And we need to have that "drilled into our heads" as our sacred oath. Anything less is agreeing to allow ourselves and our families to be defenseless slaves to be murdered at will by the government or any tyrant or criminal who comes along.
I made arrangements to have another good rifle come my way yesterday- without benefit of any paperwork.
It'll be cleaned and tuned, set up to be as efficient as I can make it, and it'll be located in a nice safe place nowhere near my residence, along with a good supply of ammunition, where it'll be available when needed.
I hope and expect to have better and more preferable equipment available to me, but it will remain as insurance and a fallback plan in the event that is not the case. Alternately, should I run across a deserving soul who requires a good piece to replace one damaged or otherwise unserviceable, that insurance policy of mine can be collected. It is particularly ironic that it is a relic of that evil empire that held too many under its blood-red hammer-and-sickle banner for two long, but then again, as our political system becomes more like that one it also becomes more desrerving of the same fate, and perhaps that old rifle will outlive them both.
It can kill an enemy at a half-mile if its operator does his part, and at a quarter-mile without hardly trying. And every time I hear of additional such *interpretations* of the constitution, I remind myself that the same more and more diluted constitution is also the only source for any legitimate authority of those who would present any such laws; pretty soon we need pay no attention to their mumblings whatsoever.
And every time I hear of such things, I pick up some more ammunition, or another spare rifle, or another set of easily-made automatic weapons parts. The time is coming...and soon....
-archy-/-
Are you saying that someone who robs folks with a gun and perhaps wounds one of his or her victims should after serving their 20 years or so be allowed to possess modern firearms?
I guess we will just have to disagree but you are broadstroking to drag all other Bill of Rights issues into this particular subject. Ironically my own perspective is much much more forgiving that most Federal and State and Local statutes governing this topic.
How many FReepers including yourself are enduring this in reality. I know....who's gonna admit it?
You mean without the liability of any paperwork.
If you weapons has any paperwork it should only be a bill of sale from the man you bought it from or an owner's manual of sorts listing it's specs, etc.
I hope everyone will realize how easy it is to pick up a copy of a trading magazine a local classied ads and select some good weapons and inexpensively buy them and then learn how to accurately use them.
The line from the movie The Patriot is so important: "Aim small, miss small."
And if such a man is free an wants to rob or murder he isn't going to obey a stupid Gun Control law anyway!
Are you really so naive to think violent criminals obey gun control laws when they want to rob and murder?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.