Care to pose that question to the "family courts" that routinely and unconstitutionally strip fathers of their right to parent?
Do you mean to say that you care for your children's welfare only as long as you can see them? If a man is not allowed to see his children - he can take it back to court. The same as a woman can take a man back to court when he does not pay child support.
Children still get hungry whether they live with one or two parents. They are pushed into a life without a father at home, the mother works and can give them less attention and then it is ok to also make them have less food, worse clothes?
The children are innocent and a divorce should give the best possible life with one parent instead of two - NO MATTER THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FATHER AND THE MOTHER.
Anything else is making the children pay for their parents actions, making them a pawn to be used to hurt the ex-spouse, and making their lives worse for revenge of a parent.
Seems to me - a loving parent would do right by his children no matter where they live, what their mother does or who she sees. To do any less is cheating your children and they will remember how they are treated by the absent mother or father.