You're just full of smears today, aren't you?
Who are these "confidants" (I suspect there aren't any) and could you provide links to their statements?
Or did you just make this up?
My comments about Paul VI's intentions were not an attempt at calumny, but, to the contrary, were an attempt to explain the thinking behind his otherwise inexplicable actions. My evidence for this is statements by assistants to Archbishop Bugnini, as well as an interview given in France by his former confessor (discussing matter other than that of the internal forum, of course). The priest definitely had a French-sounding name, but I don't remember it off-hand. If you'd like, you could "Google" on "Paul VI's confessor" or something like that and look for an interview that occurred one-to-two years ago.
Prayer is work, and as Paul VI himself said, "the Mass is the greatest form of prayer." Ideally, all work (and, therefore, prayer) challenges us so that we perform at our best. The greatness of the Classical Rite is that it challenges us to meditate on the great mystery of faith -- that of transubstantiation, God coming down upon the altar under the appearances of bread and wine. The sense of that great gift is something lost in the typical Novus Ordo celebration.
My use of a Down's Syndrome baby was meant to highlight the tragic nature of the liturgical reform and nothing more. But I'm sure you knew that.
Sorry to further inflame your chronically hyperemic constitution, but I do not make things up. Mother Teresa gave many, many addresses, and I'm sure that there are a few for which you don't have the transcript. Having said that, I will not further address your silly ad hominems, as neither I nor others (I'm sure) have the time for them.