Posted on 01/17/2002 10:36:20 PM PST by FreeSpeechConservative
Participants in a troubled Jewish-Catholic dialogue found a rare point of agreement this week in their criticism of an article by historian Daniel Goldhagen that attacks the behavior of Pope Pius XII during World War II and raises the question of the church's responsibility for the Holocaust.
In a lengthy article, "What Would Jesus Have Done? Pope Pius XII, the Catholic Church and the Holocaust," published this week in The New Republic magazine, Mr. Goldhagen charges that Pope Pius XII was an anti-Semite and a collaborator with Nazi Germany. Moreover, he claims, there is an "obvious integral relationship" between the church's historical anti-Judaism and the genesis of the Holocaust. He also calls for examining the culpability of the church for the Holocaust.
"Anti-Semitism led to the Holocaust," wrote Mr. Goldhagen, a former Harvard professor and author of a controversial 1996 book, "Hitler's Willing Executioners." "Anti-Semitism has been integral to the Catholic Church. Surely the question of what the relationship is between the church's anti-Semitism and the Holocaust should be at the center of any general treatment of either of these subjects."
Eugene Fisher, associate director of the Secretariat for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops in Washington, lashed out at Mr. Goldhagen.
"This is a remarkably uninformed piece," said Mr. Fisher, who has been involved for many years in Jewish-Catholic dialogue. "He lives in fantasy land and he is making this up. It's a sad case and he ought to see a psychiatrist."
Rabbi David Rosen, international director of inter-religious affairs at the American Jewish Committee, said that Mr. Goldhagen "has an unconcealed antagonism against the Catholic Church, and it shows."
Rabbi Rosen added that while the article was "fine on the past, it was woefully uninformed on the present efforts by the church to mend its ways." Several other scholars and members of the Jewish-Catholic dialogue interviewed for this article made the same point and were especially incensed that steps taken by Pope John Paul II were not acknowledged by Mr. Goldhagen. (See ForwardForum, Page 9.) While some agreed with Mr. Goldhagen's criticism of Pius XII, they criticized his sweeping indictment of the church. Mr. Goldhagen declined to comment on the reactions. He told the Forward that the article was the foundation for his upcoming book, "A Moral Reckoning, the Catholic Church During the Holocaust and Today," to be published in the fall.
His article comes at a time of renewed tensions between Jews and Catholics over the proposed beatification of Pius XII. For years, Jewish groups have protested the Vatican's intention to beatify a pope who, they claim, maintained a guilty silence during the Holocaust. Last summer, the work of a joint historical commission formed to study the wartime archives of the Vatican stalled over the refusal of Vatican officials to give historians full access to the archives, prompting acrimonious exchanges between Jewish and Catholic officials.
However, Seymour Reich, chairman of the International Jewish Committee on Interreligious Consultations, the official Jewish liaison with the Vatican, praised the Goldhagen article as "very powerful" and believed it would have a "great impact."
"If the Catholic Church wants to defend itself against those charges, there is only one solution - open the wartime archives," said Mr. Reich, who has spent considerable time negotiating with the Vatican to open its archives and who expressed frustration after those efforts foundered last summer.
Mr. Goldhagen's piece is presented as a review essay of several books in the issue. But his personal thoughts are clearly on display and The New Republic presents his article as "an exhaustive investigation."
Mr. Goldhagen starts the article by denouncing the "exculpatory strategies" used by apologists of Pius XII and compares them to the ones used by those trying to exculpate ordinary Germans of their responsibility for, and participation in, the Holocaust. This is a direct reference to the thesis he defended in "Hitler's Willing Executioners," which prompted vivid criticism from some of his fellow historians for his broad denunciation of the German people.
In addition to a relatively consensual criticism of Pius XII's inaction to help Jews, Mr. Goldhagen also claims that the pope was an anti-Semite who collaborated with Nazi Germany - like Marshall Philippe Petain in France or Vidkun Quisling in Norway - most noticeably by signing a concordat agreement with Adolph Hitler in 1933.
But more crucially, Mr. Goldhagen argues that the focus over Pius XII's beatification deflects criticism over the church's past and the attitude of the Vatican and the national churches during the war. This leads him to the most devastating charges of the article, the link between the Church and the Holocaust.
Mr. Goldhagen writes that the "iron curtain" erected by the church between its theological anti- Judaism and Germany's anti-Semitism is a "fiction" that must be lifted.
"This inevitably leads to a consideration of the degree of the church's culpability not just for its reactions to the eliminationist onslaught, but also for the Holocaust itself," he wrote.
He notes that the Catholic Church could find "common cause" with most of the declarations of anti-Semites in the 1930s and claims it makes "little difference" if "their litanies of hatred were not 100 percent congruent, but only a figurative 90 percent."
Mr. Goldhagen goes on to describe as insufficient efforts made by the church since the war, from the "tepid and deeply flawed" Vatican II Council in 1965, which officially recognized that the Jews did not kill Jesus, to the "half-heartedness and historical fabrications" of the 1998 "We Remember" declaration by the church on the Holocaust, which acknowledged the shortcomings of the church during the war.
"This is really the area where he shows lack of knowledge," said Rabbi Rosen of AJCommittee. "There are many other documents and efforts made that he seems not to know about and this is troubling."
LIBRARY DOCUMENTS ON PIUS XII |
|
Did Pius XII Remain Silent? Fr William Saunders Difficult Relations Between Church and Nazism - ZENIT Eichmanns Diary Reveals Churchs Assistance to Jews - ZENIT Historical Truth of Pius XIIs Work - ZENIT Jewish Recognition of Pope Pius XIIs Support - ZENIT Jewish-Catholic Commission to Study World War II - ZENIT New Studies Document Pius XIIs Opposition to Nazism ZENIT Pius XII and the Holocaust - The Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights Pius XII and the Jews - National Association of Catholic Families Pius XII Rehabilitated by Jewish Historian ZENIT Pius XII: the Martyrdom of Silence - Dr Emilia Paola Pacelli Pius XIIs 1941 Letter Protested Treatment of Jews - ZENIT Pius XIIs Cause of Beatification Progresses ZENIT Saviour of the Jews Michael OCarroll C.S.Sp. The Myth in the Light of the Archives Peirre Blet, S.J. World Press Unmasks Fallacies in Book Defaming Pius XII ZENIT Most of Rome's Jews Were Saved From Hitler's Final Solution - LOR The Good Samaritan: Jewish Praise For Pope Pius XII - Dimitri Cavalli Rabbi defends Pius XII against criticisms - Rabbi David G. Dalin Review of Pierre Blet's Book - Konrad Repgen Pius XII Saved More Jews Than Schindler - LOR |
Pius XII and the Holocaust - A Reader
A Catholic League Publication
Reprinted with permission from Fishnet/OSC
Copyright © 1996 Catholic Information Network (CIN)
September 1, 1996
Mr. Goldhagen, a former Harvard professor and author of a controversial 1996 book, "Hitler's Willing Executioners." "Anti-Semitism has been integral to the Catholic Church.
Thanks for the excellent reference materials.
I cannot help but be a bit uncomfortable with this whole debate, particularly when considering the purely religious aspect of the argument. This will sound more controversial than it should, if people really understood the nature of religion and the Catholic Church, but, in a sense, purely on religious terms what is sometimes inaccurately termed "anti-semitism" is indeed "integral to the Catholic Church," as Goldhagen argues. He is perhaps unintentionally more right than many here give him credit for. There is a fundamental incompatability between everything the Catholic Church has been for two thousand years and the Jewish religion, as there is between the Roman Church and the protestant sects. The Roman Catholic Church is anti-Protestant as well, while recognizing that the individual following these false religions is indeed one of God's creatures and thus as such entitled to the same love and respect as co-religionists.
But what I think is happening here is that two completely different arguments have been merged into one, by those with different agendas to push, with the result being a dangerous muddle of both of them. "Conservative" Catholics fully embrace the nearly heretical ecumenism of JPII's Church, shockingly turning their back on the history and traditions of their own faith and agreeing to the modernist fabrication that false religions are just "another way" to salvation. These people are violently angry with Goldhagen's argument because they don't think it is fair for him to be so mean when they have been bending over backward apologizing to and being ecumenical with the Jews. Radical and I suspect non-religious Jews also have an agenda, which is to undermine both religions and, perhaps more importantly, replace the Jewish religion with a new materialistic "religion" of Jewish victimology. This threatens the Jewish faith.
From a traditional Roman Catholic perspective, as stated above, Goldhagen's arguments have an unintentionally valid ring to them. The Church is indeed incompatible on religious terms with the Jewish faith, though by no means are the people of one faith permitted to act upon the people of the other in a violent manner. Indeed, a traditional Catholic like myself can find many appealing things in the Jewish faith and in Jewish culture while at the same time maintaining the necessary spiritual distance.
Only when the Roman Church's necessary anti-Jewishness can be seperated from the idea anti-Semitism, which the Church rightly views as unacceptable, can this debate really begin. Radical anti-religious Jews and their conservative Catholic enablers are not helping matters. I am not holding my breath.
LOL.
LIBERAL Jews....The Forward is Liberal.
Goldenhagen is brilliant, and he exposed so much evil and hypocrisy. Uncomfortable realities.
LIBERAL Jews....The Forward is Liberal.
Then why do my conservative Jewish friends write for it? I have never viewed the Forward as a liberal publication. It is solid and intellectual and daring, even when I do not agree with what they write. Shame on you for mischaracterizing it this way.
Goldhagen Wins German Prize for Holocaust Book - By Debra Bradley Ruder - Gazette Staff
Daniel J. Goldhagen, associate professor of government and social studies, has been honored by a prestigious German journal for his recent and provocative book about the Holocaust.
The Journal for German and International Politics selected Goldhagen for the 1997 Democracy Prize because his book, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, has helped sharpen public understanding about the past during a period of radical change in Germany.
"Because of the penetrating quality and the moral power of his presentation, Daniel Goldhagen has greatly stirred the consciousness of the German public," the Journal said on Tuesday. "This is especially important in the present period of transition that is shaping the transformation of the Bonn Republic to the Berlin Republic."
Goldhagen's book, which is being published in 12 languages and has become a best-seller in the United States, Germany, and seven other countries, has drawn enormous praise, criticism, and media attention. It argues that the perpetrators of the Holocaust were ordinary Germans who were driven by virulent anti-Semitism to degrade, torture, and kill Jews. The volume, published in the U.S. last March, is based on Goldhagen's prize-winning Harvard doctoral dissertation.
Goldhagen will accept the Democracy Prize on March 10 in Bonn, where the "laudatio" speech will be given by Jürgen Habermas, the world-renowned German philosopher and social critic. The roughly $6,400 prize is given occasionally and was last bestowed in 1990, on the democratic movement of the former East Germany.
In making its choice, the Journal -- a mainstream political and intellectual monthly -- said the ferocious debate sparked by Hitler's Willing Executioners provides a "striking example" that the past cannot be forgotten. The book, it noted, has underscored that there is no historical German "normalcy" to which Germany can return, and that "the founding principles of the Federal Republic of Germany" must continue to govern unified Germany.
It also praised Goldhagen for helping provide answers to the German descendants of the Holocaust, answers "which, as a rule, parents or grandparents had denied them. And the answers of German historiography have until now not been able to fill the gap," it said. Goldhagen, who has been on leave from Harvard this term, said he is "delighted, thrilled, and, even more, honored and deeply moved" to receive the prize.
"When I wrote my book, I believed that it was only about how to understand and think about the past," he reflected. "More and more, I have come to realize that the book is also about the present and the future."
Like I always say, there are some 'Conservatives' here who are Liberals/Marxists in sheep's clothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.