Fine. Then here is a simple test case. Last year (on Ashcroft's watch) Riady (of Chinagate fame) told a court under a DOJ agreement (which says that if he lies he looses his plea bargain and might go to jail), that the Clinton and DNC campaign organizations did NOT return the ILLEGAL contributions that he gave them ... AS THEY CLAIMED. Now the DNC and Clinton people already publically admitted that the money they got from Riady WAS ILLEGAL ... which is why they went to great lengths to say PUBLICALLY that they have returned all that money. So IF they did NOT return the money (i.e., the DOJ finds NO PAPER TRAIL indicating they did) shouldn't there be a trial underway charging them with a rather major violation of the law? And IF there is a paper trail indicating that they did return the money, then shouldn't Riady's plea agreement already be REVOKED and he be a fugitive from justice? Either way, someone should now be in jail. Show me how there wouldn't be enough evidence to prosecute in either case. Or show me that there IS an investigation of this matter underway. Otherwise, I'm left wondering if Ashcroft is a crook TOO.