Replies

IF this is true, then it is good news. IF this is true, then we can only credit Judicial Watch for having brought it to light.

But how do we know that this is true? Because Larry Klayman says so? Larry Klayman is a phenomenal, monumental liar, and his word has absolutely no weight with any honest, knowledgable person. I am waiting for some independent confirmation of this development, as nothing that Larry Klayman has to say can be trusted.

Assuming that this is true, it is unfortunate that it is left to Judicial Watch to review these e-mails, as they have no expertise or personnel to even begin to undertake such a project. If these e-mails have any historical significance, they will be totally lost if they are turned over to Judicial Watch, who will simply store them in boxes to be unopened and unexamined, as they have done with so many other documents, just like the last scene in "Raiders of the Lost Ark."

Yes, I like this development, but I can't stand Judicial Watch, and I can't stand you. Both of you are just insufferable blowhards who care more about getting your names in the news than actually accomplishing anything of importance.