Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BluH2o
My experience with JW (and I've made contributions in the past ... not recently) they always seem to come up empty.

That is not fair. They may not have "won" any of their CIVIL suits but do you really think the whole purpose was to win a CIVIL suit? The thanks we owe Judicial Watch is that they doggedly used the CIVIL arena to expose the CRIMINAL misdeeds of the Clinton administration and DNC at a time when no one else was even trying. Starr and Monica were just a distraction to keep people from looking deeper ... to keep the public's attention away from the really serious stuff (treason, murder, election tampering, blackmail of Congress, etc).

Klayman is how we first learned about Chinagate and much we know about Chinagate. He is the ONLY reason we learned in Filegate that the Clinton's illegally acquired not just the couple hundred files they admitted, but at least a 1000 and perhaps 1000's of FBI files and were loading them onto DNC databases as well as taking the information HOME. Judicial Watch is how we learned about the willful destruction of emails to obstruct justice in all the other criminal activities the Clinton's and DNC engaged in. Klayman's effort are why we learned that the order to NOT autopsy Ron Brown's body came from the Whitehouse and JCS, AND that there was a second survivor reported to the Warren Christopher by Abe Sockowitz which the government never mentioned to anyone. And his efforts did not stop when Bush was elected. This is a case in point and would any of us know about the Riady non-refund if it weren't for Judicial Watch press releases?

And that is just the short list, there were many more CRIMES that were revealed as a result of Klayman's CIVIL efforts. Now whether Ashcroft does anything with that knowledge, AS IS HIS RESPONSIBILITY, should be the chief concern of Klayman haters and Move-On'ers. Otherwise, their hatred of Klayman is being used as an EXCUSE for the Bush administration ignoring the law. NO EXCUSES. Don't support Klayman now ... fine ... but ALSO make sure that Ashcroft does HIS job and investigates the crimes that Klayman and his staff uncovered.

41 posted on 01/17/2002 12:49:06 PM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: BeAChooser
Whoa ... want a strong upstanding defense of Larry Klayman and JW ... sounds to me you may even be associated with JW. Bottom line ... JW throws a lot of crap at the side of the barn, hoping something will stick ... maybe (this time) something will ...
In the interval, in spite of an aggressive JW fund raising campaign (even had a message left on my recorder) I'll keep my money in my wallet. I don't make a habit of throwing good money after bad ...
I want bonafide concrete results. JW, at least to this point, has disappointed me.
57 posted on 01/17/2002 1:28:53 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: BeAChooser
BUMP !!!!!
66 posted on 01/17/2002 2:38:36 PM PST by Donald Stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson