JUDICIAL WATCH UNCOVERS 1.8 MILLION CLINTON WHITE HOUSE E-MAIL

Judicial Watch e-mail ^ | January 17, 2002 | JW

[litany_of_lies]

GOVERNMENT ADMITS 1.8 MILLION E-MAIL FOUND AS A RESULT OF JUDICIAL WATCH‚S EXPOSING HIDDEN CLINTON-GORE E-MAIL ˆ RESTORED AT A COST OF OVER $12 MILLION

E-MAILGATE UPDATE

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, said today that the government, in a court filing January 9, 2002, has admitted that it found 1,844,242 e-mail from the Clinton-Gore White House. This e-mail has never been searched in response to subpoenas and documents requests from Judicial Watch, Congress, and independent counsels. The e-mail were restored at a cost to taxpayers thus far of $12,066,346. The e-mail, which is in the custody of the National Archives, must now be searched pursuant to court orders.

Judicial Watch, which is prosecuting the Filegate $90 million class action lawsuit on behalf of those whose FBI files were misused by the Clinton White House, first exposed the e-mail scandal in early 2000 through its client Sheryl Hall, a former top computer official at the Clinton White House, who testified that incriminating e-mail concerning virtually all the Clinton-Gore scandals had never been produced as they should have in response to document requests and subpoenas. Another Judicial Watch client, former White House computer contractor Betty Lambuth, also testified (along with others) that high-level White House officials threatened Northrop Grumman White House computer contractors to keep quiet about the hidden e-mail or face jail and firing. These threats occurred in the middle of the Lewinsky scandal. The scandal was the subject of a months long evidentiary hearing that included the testimony of the late Charles Ruff, John Podesta, and Cheryl Mills. The court is in now considering whether to commence criminal contempt proceedings. A decision is expected soon.

„If not for Judicial Watch‚s heroic clients, this e-mail would have been lost forever. We are confident that the e-mail contains a treasure trove of information concerning Filegate, Chinagate, and, yes, even Enrongate. Any incriminating e-mail will be part of renewed Judicial Watch efforts to put the Clintons in jail,‰ stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.

[ken21]

larry makes his living doing this derring-do. but nothing ever happens.

[palo verde]

hi litany
thank you for your post 103
I learned from it, and I found it heartening
Love, Palo

[goldilucky]

"Oldeconomybuyer, if Larry Klayman is your idea of a "nutcase," then I am proud to be called "cheerleading" for a "nutcase"!"</>

Nothing could be anymore nuttier than the former Clinton administration.

[FReethesheeples]

Some of us are worried about Larry's health, & I don't mean "mental health."

I saw him last week. Prayers and best wishes might be in order for LK.

[185JHP]

Thanks for the ping alert. Unfortunately if Larry is ever put on trial for extracting money, but never accomplishing much of anything - there'll be plenty of evidence. I don't know if he means well, or he's like Browne, but I won't give him another dollar unless/until I see some significant results. As aggavating as being deposed is, it isn't worth me paying him for forcing vile peole to give depositions. "Sound and fury" - you know the rest. FReegards

[GOPJ]

Is Larry OK? He's done so much for all of us. I hope things are good for him.

[185JHP]

I'm all for exposing corruption - but with this guy, I'm seeing a lot of fund raising, a lot of grandstanding - and no results. Soap bubbles are pretty, but have no substance. I suspect but cannot prove that this guy's activities are about self-aggrandizement and puffery. How many years? How much longer before some beef gets delivered? Even if he is in fact sincere, I want to see some results from his antics. FReegards and no offense to you.

[BeAChooser]

Then the DOJ has no excuses, and the public can should hold them accountable.

[goldilucky]

"As others have pointed out, Larry Klayman is not a prosecutor and he has no authority to try criminal cases. But what he CAN do is expose the illegality through civil cases and make it part of the public record. Then the DOJ has no excuses, and the public can hold them accountable."

I support JW's efforts in exposing government corruption. Corruption stems from the top and trickles on down. History has clearly shown this. And for the DOJ to be protecting the Clinton's means they are obstructing justice and can be sued too!

[goldilucky]

Yep, the same way they are both tied up with Rockefeller oil business and money.

[185JHP]

I don't have a problem with efforts to expose corruption of Republicans - I just am not convinced that this guy has proper motives, and I'm waiting for the results - like indictments.

[185JHP]

Not only does he not have the power to bring criminal indictments, nothing he has ever done has led to criminal indictments. IMO LK is about making $$$ for LK. I'll be happy to be convinced otherwise. Do you know how much of the money he gets is spent on fundraising? I don't.

[deport]

2000 JW form 990

• $25,935,456 Direct Public support
• $13,297,454 (51%) Fundraising
• $ 4,172,968 (16%) Educating the public
• $ 1,240,262 (4.7%) Legal action providing representation or acting in capacity of Amicus