Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDICIAL WATCH UNCOVERS 1.8 MILLION CLINTON WHITE HOUSE E-MAIL
Judicial Watch e-mail ^ | January 17, 2002 | JW

Posted on 01/17/2002 10:38:33 AM PST by litany_of_lies

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last
To: Black Jade
larry makes his living doing this derring-do. but nothing ever happens.
121 posted on 01/22/2002 6:13:37 PM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
hi litany
thank you for your post 103
I learned from it, and I found it heartening
Love, Palo
122 posted on 01/22/2002 6:21:50 PM PST by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
"Oldeconomybuyer, if Larry Klayman is your idea of a "nutcase," then I am proud to be called "cheerleading" for a "nutcase"!"</>

Nothing could be anymore nuttier than the former Clinton administration.

123 posted on 01/22/2002 6:55:10 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
Some of us are worried about Larry's health, & I don't mean "mental health."

I saw him last week. Prayers and best wishes might be in order for LK.

124 posted on 01/22/2002 8:14:36 PM PST by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
Thanks for the ping alert. Unfortunately if Larry is ever put on trial for extracting money, but never accomplishing much of anything - there'll be plenty of evidence. I don't know if he means well, or he's like Browne, but I won't give him another dollar unless/until I see some significant results. As aggavating as being deposed is, it isn't worth me paying him for forcing vile peole to give depositions. "Sound and fury" - you know the rest. FReegards
125 posted on 01/22/2002 9:49:00 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: FReethesheeples
Is Larry OK? He's done so much for all of us. I hope things are good for him.
126 posted on 01/23/2002 6:24:55 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

Comment #127 Removed by Moderator

Comment #128 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
I'm all for exposing corruption - but with this guy, I'm seeing a lot of fund raising, a lot of grandstanding - and no results. Soap bubbles are pretty, but have no substance. I suspect but cannot prove that this guy's activities are about self-aggrandizement and puffery. How many years? How much longer before some beef gets delivered? Even if he is in fact sincere, I want to see some results from his antics. FReegards and no offense to you.
129 posted on 01/24/2002 10:17:54 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
Then the DOJ has no excuses, and the public can should hold them accountable.
130 posted on 01/25/2002 6:31:21 AM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
"As others have pointed out, Larry Klayman is not a prosecutor and he has no authority to try criminal cases. But what he CAN do is expose the illegality through civil cases and make it part of the public record. Then the DOJ has no excuses, and the public can hold them accountable."

I support JW's efforts in exposing government corruption. Corruption stems from the top and trickles on down. History has clearly shown this. And for the DOJ to be protecting the Clinton's means they are obstructing justice and can be sued too!

131 posted on 01/25/2002 9:53:42 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

Comment #132 Removed by Moderator

Comment #133 Removed by Moderator

Comment #134 Removed by Moderator

Comment #135 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
Yep, the same way they are both tied up with Rockefeller oil business and money.
136 posted on 01/26/2002 11:18:32 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
I don't have a problem with efforts to expose corruption of Republicans - I just am not convinced that this guy has proper motives, and I'm waiting for the results - like indictments.
137 posted on 02/02/2002 12:38:04 AM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

Comment #138 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
Not only does he not have the power to bring criminal indictments, nothing he has ever done has led to criminal indictments. IMO LK is about making $$$ for LK. I'll be happy to be convinced otherwise. Do you know how much of the money he gets is spent on fundraising? I don't.
139 posted on 02/04/2002 5:59:41 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP
2000 JW form 990
140 posted on 02/04/2002 6:13:53 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson