Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enron Gave Big Bucks to Democrats, Backed 'Global Warning' Scam
Newsmax ^ | Jan 17, 2002 | Phil Brennan

Posted on 01/16/2002 8:30:09 PM PST by spycatcher

Scandal-plagued Enron Corp., cited by Democrats as a big giver to President Bush and the GOP, gave a cool $420,000 to Democrats when the corporation was desperate to get the Clinton administration's help in having the potentially disastrous Kyoto treaty made the law of the land.

Senate ratification of the treaty, which foes explained would have cost the U.S. billions and had a deadly effect on the U.S. economy, would have been a bonanza for Enron.

What's Good for Enron Isn't Good for America

According to Washington Times reporter Jerry Seper, a December 1997 private internal memo written by Enron executive John Palmisano said the treaty would be "good for Enron stock!!"

"The memo said the Kyoto treaty - later signed by Mr. Clinton and leaders of 166 other countries, but never ratified by the Senate - 'would do more to promote Enron's business than will almost any other regulatory initiative outside of restructuring the energy and natural gas industries in Europe and the United States.'"

Easy Access to Clinton and Gore

Writing in Wednesday's Times, Seper reports, "Federal and confidential corporate records show that after donating thousands of dollars in soft money and PAC donations beginning in 1995, Enron received easy access to President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore."

Seper revealed that Clinton's Energy Department and Environmental Protection Agency "often made themselves available for Enron executives to discuss the firm's needs, according to records, even arranging for meetings with key congressional staffers."

Enron's drive to get the Kyoto Protocol ratified continued even after the Senate voted 95-0 to set restrictions on any climate negotiations. The Senate resolution warned U.S. diplomats against negotiating any climate treaty in which less developed nations such as communist China would have fewer restrictions imposed on them than the U.S. and other developed countries.

That vote gave clear warning that the Senate would never ratify the treaty, costing Enron potential profits in the billions. As a result, Enron used its open door to the Clinton White House to lobby hard for a treaty that would give it the ability to buy and sell trading credits to emit carbon dioxide as part of a strategy to reduce "greenhouse gases."

Under the system pushed by Enron, new investments in gas-fired plants and pipelines would be expanded and coal-fired power plants, which emit more carbon dioxide, would be curtailed. Seper noted, "Natural gas, electricity and their delivery systems constitute Enron's major businesses."

During a White House meeting in July 1997, Enron Chairman Kenneth L. Lay prodded Clinton and Gore to support a "market-based" approach to what he described as the problem of "global warming," a theory discredited by a majority of the world's climatologists.

In the face of Senate hostility to the Kyoto accords, Enron continued to urge the Clinton administration to seek a "restructuring" of the treaty that would have been a "first step to solving the problems of global climate change." Seper notes that the company "sought laws that would have favored Enron's natural gas inventory and reduced competition from coal."

On Feb. 20, 1998, during a meeting with Energy Secretary Federico Pena, Lay "encouraged the Clinton administration to seek electricity legislation favored by Enron, outlining for the secretary what the company believed were the "important" pending legislative concerns.

"Today's meeting between Ken Lay and Energy Secretary Federico Pena to discuss electricity legislation went very well," said a memo written by Jeff Keller, the company's Washington governmental affairs chief.

"Secretary Pena indicated that the White House proposed bill is 'on the president's desk,' and that Clinton could be convinced to release the White House proposal in the next few days," Keller wrote. "He suggested that President Clinton might be motivated by some key contacts from important constituents."

The records showed that Lay took that advice and sent a letter to Clinton that day, asking him to "move this matter forward."

Seper writes that Clinton administration officials have denied any wrongdoing, saying they were only responding to constituent requests.

Hypocrisy Alert

But while such Democrats as Rep. Henry Waxman of California attempt to create suspicion that Enron's contributions to President Bush and other Republicans gave the company undue influence with the administration without a scintilla of evidence to back up their imaginings, more real proof of the cozy ties between Enron and the Clinton administration continues to unfold.

Seper recalls, for example that, the Washington-based Export-Import Bank approved a $302 million loan toward a $3 billion Enron-controlled power plant in India in 1994.

Wrote Seper: "Mr. Clinton took an interest in the deal, asking the U.S. ambassador to that country and his former chief of staff, Thomas F. 'Mack' McLarty, then a presidential adviser, to monitor the proposal.

"Mr. McLarty - who later became a paid Enron director - spoke with Mr. Lay on several occasions about the plant. In 1996, four days before India granted approval for Enron's project, the Houston-based firm contributed $100,000 to the Democratic Party."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: enron; enronlist; globalwarming; kyoto

1 posted on 01/16/2002 8:30:09 PM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
Oh, my goodness!!!....What will those DNC enviro-constituents say about THIS?

Clinton selling out to those "corporate whores" of Enron?

2 posted on 01/16/2002 9:26:46 PM PST by eric_da_grate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eric_da_grate; Enron_list
Enron's Green Side
3 posted on 01/16/2002 9:30:42 PM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
BUMP
4 posted on 01/16/2002 9:32:18 PM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
bttt
5 posted on 01/17/2002 8:21:16 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
You forgot to mention that opposition to the India-Enron contract grew out of the fact that India has large coal deposits and no natural gas.
6 posted on 01/17/2002 8:41:26 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I guess I missed that
7 posted on 01/17/2002 9:36:25 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
The coal vs natural gas is important because it points up another instance where Clinton took action that favored Enron and Bush took the opposite stance.

Bush made it a campaign promise to seek new technology for cleaner burning coal to make use of our own coal deposits.

8 posted on 01/17/2002 10:06:39 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Thanks, found the info here: Enron's India Disaster

"To secure supplies of liquefied natural gas for the project, Enron lobbied New Delhi to change its tariff system, which had been designed to discourage energy imports. Enron got India to slash its duty on imports of liquefied natural gas from 105 percent to 15 percent.

"With those changes approved, Enron brokered a deal with Qatar to provide the Dabhol plant 2.5 million tons of liquefied natural gas per year for 25 years, starting in 1997."

9 posted on 01/17/2002 10:22:46 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
An old Business Week article re Ms. Mark
10 posted on 01/18/2002 2:57:10 AM PST by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
Good eye Spycatcher.

Might want to look into whether there was any Enron influence on Clinton in locking up all that coal in Utah, apart from the obvious aspect of Clinton's paying off SE Asian campaign contributors holding big coal interests.

11 posted on 01/18/2002 5:40:04 AM PST by Agamemnon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson