Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texaggie79;antidisestablishment
I fear a deterioration in my community therefore, ultimately, a threat to mine and my family's well being.

Ultimately, Libertarianism is a philosophy, not a form of government. Start talking about the realities of politics and its adherents’ eyes glaze over. Suggest compromise and watch them go ballistic. It’s almost a religious thing.

Excellent. Take the one Republican leader who really rubs libertarians the wrong way: Rudy Giuliani. He concentrated on non-violent crimes such as vagrancy, prostitution, pan-handling, etc. The result? A dramatic drop in violent crime, a populace that feels more secure, one the feels free to walk the streets, tourists that feel free to tour NYC, cabbies that feel free to drive to more neighborhoods, citizens who feel free to go to Central Park without harassment. Real freedom for the majority as a result of common sense, not imaginary freedom for a select few deviants as a result of a philosophy.

111 posted on 01/15/2002 8:31:51 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: kidd
Real freedom for the majority as a result of common sense, not imaginary freedom for a select few deviants as a result of a philosophy.

Well put. That is where I see that I and Libertarians part ways. I follow common sense.

124 posted on 01/15/2002 8:39:12 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

To: kidd
LOL!! Rudy Guliani would be a fine Libertarian Mayor. The crimes of vagrancy on public and trespassing private property, Drug use and sales on public and trespassing private property, prostitution on public and trespassing private property are REAL CRIMES fully and responsibly prosecuted by a Libertarian Police Force. Prosecution of REAL CRIMES makes a safe and secure society.
149 posted on 01/15/2002 8:55:06 AM PST by scottiewottie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

To: kidd
Real freedom for the majority as a result of common sense, not imaginary freedom for a select few deviants as a result of a philosophy.

This is perhaps the most ignorant and unintellectual statement that I've ever seen posted to FR. What exactly is the definition of "common sense"? You need philosophy to define such terms. Leaving your terms undefined as if they were universals that everyone agreed upon simply won't cut the mustard.

154 posted on 01/15/2002 8:58:44 AM PST by The Green Goblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson