[Dane]

July 23, 2001

When all is said and done Arthur Andersen is the one entity which will have egg all over it's face, IMHO.

But that doesn't stop you trying to manufacture a scandal and smearing Ashcroft, when back in July, Arthur Andersen was a "respected big 5" accounting firm.

Which accounting firm should have AG Ashcroft picked Bill?

[Uncle Bill]

Try reading the last article in my post, if that's not too much to ask. It's dated AUGUST 25TH, 2000 in the Wall Street Journal. The FBI is one of the most corrupt entities in the country. You don't hire a non-corrupt entity to fix a corrupt entity if you want to stay corrupt. You hire a corrupt one. They knew it, it's nothing new. Business as usual.

[Uncle Bill]

"But that doesn't stop you trying to manufacture a scandal and smearing Ashcroft"

I haven't manufactured a thing. I've merely posted an account of what Ashcroft did. If it's a scandal, it's his, created by him, not me. Smearing? Get serious. I'm a little tired, I'll see you tomorrow.

[Ada Coddington]

Which accounting firm should have AG Ashcroft picked Bill?

One not quite so tame?

[Wonder Warthog]

"Which accounting firm should have AG Ashcroft picked Bill?"

Well, certainly the contract should be frozen at this point and any such audits postponed until "AA" clears the air about their illegal actions in shredding documents. If it is impossible to freeze the audits, another firm should be chosen.