Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CIB-173RDABN; Harpseal
Our founding fathers did not seem to have a problem with armed citizens. They thought it important enough to put in the constitution.

Interestingly, with the exception of a Navy, the framers made absolutely no mention of arming any part of the federal government. How does the proliferation of armed federal agencies - to say nothing of the agencies themselves - meet the test of constitutionality ?

72 posted on 01/15/2002 9:58:42 AM PST by Dukie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Dukie
Your reading of the Constitution does match mine and they did mention the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

Stay safe - Stay well - stay armed - Yorktown

75 posted on 01/15/2002 10:02:31 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: Dukie

Interestingly, with the exception of a Navy, the framers made absolutely no mention of arming any part of the federal government. How does the proliferation of armed federal agencies - to say nothing of the agencies themselves - meet the test of constitutionality ?

I don't know, I guess someone will have to ask the supreme court.

Personally, I don't believe the founding fathers would have a problem with an Army that was armed.

You mentioned the Navy, and then said "federal agencies" do you have any in mind?


84 posted on 01/15/2002 11:54:21 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson