Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enron 'Scandal' Should Prompt Indictments - for the Clintons
Newsmax ^ | 1/13/02 | Carl Limbacher...

Posted on 01/13/2002 7:21:33 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Democrats now foaming at the mouth over "Enrongate" didn't know when they had a good thing, and in fact, it's now plain that Bush's indulgence only engendered their contempt.

Now that the Washington scandal machine has Bush in its crosshairs, it's time for the president to make sure the rules apply to both sides equally - and if that means prosecuting Bill and Hillary Clinton, so be it.

It certainly seems that one of the Bush administration's early decisions was to try to cool the political climate, and "move on". Doing so required letting Clinton and his crime family off the hook.

IMHO, this was a big mistake. For one thing, re-establishing the principal that even the President is not above the law is essential for our long-term survival as a nation. Second, thugs like the two Clintons and their cronies in Congress always interpret steps like Bush's as a sign of weakness. Weakness invites contempt and further attacks.

Now we have a second chance. I do not know if the investigations Bush closed can be re-opened. But I do know that Enron stinks, and that none of that stink has stuck to Bush. However, some of it clearly sitcks to Clinton. Bring it on.

21 posted on 01/13/2002 8:40:20 AM PST by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Well, a defeatist, fatalistic mentality does us no good, either.
22 posted on 01/13/2002 8:47:09 AM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
Maybe Bush was allowing Clinton(s) to make this so blatant they would simply hang themselves in the public eye. Remember, Bush never made civic decision to pardon Clinton...
23 posted on 01/13/2002 8:50:49 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
I always stood against a full, frontal assault by the Bush Administration in trying to put Clinton(s) in jail. I, too, want to see them brought to justice, it was just a matter of how.

It is about time for the law of unintended consequences to come back and bite the RATS, and this is one way to achieve that objective. If they push it and continue to overreach, the evidence will point to Clinton more than anyone else.

Wouldn't it be even more sweet if Clinton winds up behind bars by what the RATS do? I think that would be suh-weeeet!

24 posted on 01/13/2002 8:53:59 AM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Wouldn't it be even more sweet if Clinton winds up behind bars

See what I mean? This remains a pipe dream of too many on the right. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

25 posted on 01/13/2002 8:58:32 AM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
You didn't finish my sentence.

I said, "Wouldn't it be even more sweet if Clinton winds up behind bars by what the RATS do?

Like I said, I'd love to see Clinton eventually brought to justice, but I don't lose sleep over it. Sometimes it's better to leave well enough alone.

26 posted on 01/13/2002 9:07:12 AM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection; rdb3; M. Thatcher; EternalHope; RJCogburn; ex-snook; Donald Stone; evad...
Thanks for the ping!:

Great article, fyi:

Steyn: They can't Pin This on Bush
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/607112/posts

27 posted on 01/13/2002 9:27:41 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
Hi EternalHope
excellent post
I agree with every word you said
Love, Palo
28 posted on 01/13/2002 9:27:48 AM PST by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Hi Fred
thanks for the ping
I see eye to eye with you on this
Love, Palo
29 posted on 01/13/2002 9:29:44 AM PST by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Donald Stone
Suspending the "Rule of Law" for political convenience such as Presiident Bush has done may be the downfall of both the Democrats & Republicans

perceptive post
Love, Palo
30 posted on 01/13/2002 9:31:39 AM PST by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Enron is a "pop and no kick" for the RATS, but they are salivating so profusely about a chance to down the Bush presidency, they didn't pay attention. Their rifle is about to explode right in their faces.

So, grab some popcorn, a Coke, sit back and relax. The fireworks are about to begin. It's going to be a magnificent show!


BIG Texas DITTOS BUMP to that! ! My feelings exactly. Make sure to check out the article I bumped you to. Aw, what the hey! Here it is again!:

Great article, fyi:

Steyn: They can't Pin This on Bush
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/607112/posts

31 posted on 01/13/2002 9:36:03 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

$600 Billion Enron Shares May Have Propped US Market Post 9/11-Bill Clinton Could Surface in Probe
32 posted on 01/13/2002 9:44:39 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Christine11; BillofRights; mwl1; habs4ever
Hi guys,
it may turn out that not carrying out the Rule of Law will hurt Pubbies more than carrying it out would have done
In Impeachment, the Pubbies did the right thing, and it brought them political gold
Good is indivisible
Putting the country first would have made this administration invulnerable
Love, Palo
33 posted on 01/13/2002 9:47:53 AM PST by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Hi Tumbleweed
thanks for the article
it is filled with food for thought
I read the thread -- and find the posts perceptive
Love, Palo
34 posted on 01/13/2002 9:49:46 AM PST by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
That's what I mean. Get out of the way when your opponent is beating up on itself.
35 posted on 01/13/2002 9:58:14 AM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: catpuppy; habs4ever
I see I'm not the only poster on the thread who realizes the potential harm to this administration and Republicans
by the decision not to carry out the Rule of Law with regard to the clinton corruption

hi habs, and who do you think is architecting the PR campaign for this
and doing the strategy for the Dems
slick willy, who Heads the Dem Party
Pres. Bush would have been sensible to neutralize him by bringing his corruption to Law
Love, Palo
36 posted on 01/13/2002 9:59:33 AM PST by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Well, a defeatist, fatalistic mentality does us no good, either.

My "mentality" is the product of the facts of what Bush/Ashcroft have done, but I don't think it is defeatist.

Bush/Ashcroft shut down the campaign finance task force which was investigating the criminal corruption of the Clintons and their gang. It was investigating Chinagate, which means the corruption that damaged our national security.

As part of shutting down the investigation, Ashcroft sent Robert Conrad, the head of the task force who had told Reno to appoint an IC to investigate Gore, out of town to NC.

Most recently, Bush/Ashcroft allowed the CEO of Loral, who was the largest single contributor to the DNC at one time, to skate free while they fine the shareholders of the company for making China's missile program better.

What possible evidence is there that Bush is going to "unleash" the DOJ when he and Ashcroft have spent a fair amount of time this past year buying additional leashes?

I think it is the Bush crowd that is the defeatist bunch, convinced that they just can't succeed in doing what is right with respect to the Clintons' corruption. Sadly, for a whole bunch of people, its "Bush....right or wrong, Bush".

37 posted on 01/13/2002 10:13:37 AM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
There may be more coming. Check this:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/607432/posts

If Ford gets in bad trouble, it will shake things up worse than Enron. Might explain why the Ford family got back in the driver's seat. And, I ask, didn't he say he was going to do it without salary? Desperate to salvage just stock value?

38 posted on 01/13/2002 10:19:54 AM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
    Sorry, but Limbacher's examples or suggestions of where to go are really small potatoes compared to the criminal corruption associated with the campaign finance task force's area which Ashcroft/Bush let slide.

    Most recently, allowing Loral off with a limp slap on the wrist, which will be paid by the stockholders and not the guilty party. National security, as endangered by the Chinagate/campaign finance corruption is a far more dangerous and serious offense than Roger Clinton, but Bush/Ashcroft closed their collective eyes. I'm nowhere near forgiving Bush/Ashcroft for that.

This is about Clinton(s). The real damage occurred at Impeachment, Clinton walked and the Rats were able to say he did nothing wrong. The smear of foul ugly innocence sticks to our faces today. Purification for the conservatives will only be achieved in the public eye through due process.

39 posted on 01/13/2002 10:28:26 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever; catpuppy; mwl1
I think the Bush administration is blameless in this scandal
but slick willy is intent on sabotaging President Bush
He still has the media in his thrall
plus the Dems in Congress
he will cause mischief
slick willy was the downfall of the Dem Party when he was in Office
he now presents challenges to the Bush Administration
Love, Palo
40 posted on 01/13/2002 11:03:55 AM PST by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson