If he shacks up with a woman, that's OK?
You don't seem to understand what I am concerned about. I am not asking for perfection. I am trying to stop the legitimizing of a behavior that will destroy our culture.
Again, you act as if homosexuality is something new. And Bush is not "legitimizing" homosexuality. He's appointing people to positions based on their qualifications for the job.
Should he fire all gays from government jobs? What about private employers? Should they fire all gays, no matter how well they DO THE JOB THEY WERE HIRED TO DO?
No jobs for gays, in your world, right?
Somebody might see a gay doing a job for, say IBM, and think IBM management condones gay behavior.
It's got nothing to do with condoning or not condoning. Being gay has absolutely nothing to do with whether someone can be a representative of the United States.
Guest is an ambassador, not a bishop.
I didn't say that. I said I'm trying to stop the legitimazation of a lifestyle that is going to destroy the culture. Plain and simple. If we ever get to the point where we beat back the agenda of the homosexuals, I'll begin to address hetrosexual fornication. =)
Should he fire all gays from government jobs? What about private employers? Should they fire all gays, no matter how well they DO THE JOB THEY WERE HIRED TO DO?
No need to start screaming at me. I am trying to point out that, as president and leader of our country, he has an obligation to uphold certain standards. There is no excuse for appointing, and thereby normalizing, a behavior that is contributing to the decay of our society.
I never said that we should fire all gays. I simply don't think a supposedly conservative president should appoint actively gay men to positions where they represent our country. Its wrong.
No jobs for gays, in your world, right?
Show me where I said that? You're starting to thorw stuff out of left field.
Somebody might see a gay doing a job for, say IBM, and think IBM management condones gay behavior.
Again...left field. We're talking about openly gay men taking their boyfriends with them when they represent our country. I have a right to be indignant, and I have the right to bang pots and pans and alert people to the declining standards within the republican party.
It's got nothing to do with condoning or not condoning. Being gay has absolutely nothing to do with whether someone can be a representative of the United States.
Standards please.