Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexual Ambassador causing problems.
http://www.frc.org/get/n02a004.cfm ^ | January 7, 2002 | By Fred Jackson and Rusty Pugh

Posted on 01/12/2002 2:14:54 PM PST by GrandMoM

News headline Retrieved

Gay Ambassador Troubles Embassy Staff

Story: Little attention was drawn to Michael Guest's homosexual relationship with his "partner" during his confirmation process as President Bush's ambassador to Romania. However, those working under Guest in Bucharest now find it difficult to avoid his flaunting of the relationship, according to an American embassy worker who recently spoke with FRC.

Although Guest had been active in a gay and lesbian group within the State Department, he was not publicly identified as being homosexual until his swearing-in on September 18, when Secretary of State Colin Powell acknowledged Guest's "partner," Alex Nevarez, during the ceremony.

Nevarez, a former teacher, relocated to Romania with Guest and now lives with him there in the residence provided to the ambassador by the U.S. government.

According to our source, several families in the embassy community have expressed concern about the ambassador's living arrangement, and at least one will no longer bring their children to embassy social events because they do not want them exposed to the example set by Guest and his "partner."

For example, Guest and Nevarez escorted one another as a couple at the embassy's annual Marine Corps Ball, a highly formal event. "It's causing me to have to compromise the values I raise my family by," the source said.

The appointment of Guest to serve in Romania showed a particular cultural insensitivity, given that the country is a stronghold of the conservative Eastern Orthodox Church.

Our source indicated that the Orthodox Church is represented at virtually all government ceremonies in Romania. One Romanian professor, in a letter to a Bucharest daily newspaper, said that "Romanians . . . cannot comprehend homosexual acts in any other way but as a deviation from the natural order and the world created by the Lord," and he noted that the Guest appointment "generates bewilderment, indignation, and disgust among the Romanians."

Romanian laws relating to homosexuality were recently liberalized, but only under coercion from the European Union, to which Romania hopes to gain entrance. Although Guest has denied he will promote a "gay agenda" as ambassador, his mere presence in Bucharest is already having that effect.

Another person serving at the embassy held a meeting in November to encourage leaders of Romania's fledgling "gay movement." And some embassy employees fear that Bucharest will gain a reputation as a "gay-friendly" post, so that more homosexuals will request assignment there. Ambassador Guest's treatment of same-sex "partners" (including his own) as the equivalent of married spouses is a mere half step away from government endorsement of "same-sex marriage." Not only does this violate the spirit of the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (which defines marriage as being between one man and one woman), but it is also a distraction from the important work of our embassy in Romania.


TOPICS: Announcements; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: braad; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-393 next last
To: JMJ333
Pushes every one of my buttons. Between the crumb throwing to the pro-lifers, the normalizing of homosexuals in the republican party and in this administration, the stem cells cave-in, and Ramadan at the White house--I've had it.

I think it is funny that the same people here who slammed Clinton for appointing gays are very quiet when Bush appoints gays.

21 posted on 01/12/2002 2:51:12 PM PST by Austim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: a_witness
President Bush appointed him ?

President Bush would not appoint a homosexual to represent America in an other nation. No, could not happen! No Way! Only a pervert like Bill Clinton Would appoint a gay to be an ambassador!

22 posted on 01/12/2002 2:54:21 PM PST by Austim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ruggers
Are you for real?

What, you want vivid details?

Then go to some porn site..

23 posted on 01/12/2002 2:54:32 PM PST by GrandMoM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tomakaze
LOL, the gay and lesbians run the State Dept, no news here, they also run the NY Times.
24 posted on 01/12/2002 2:55:06 PM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Austim
Were not quiet Bush is wrong on this.
26 posted on 01/12/2002 3:00:26 PM PST by Unicorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
given that the country is a stronghold of the conservative Eastern Orthodox Church.

Yeah funny how people who are Orthodox tend to be conservative. (/sarcasm)

The better way to look at it is that OUR country is a stronghold of the liberal Western Heterodox Church. Which among other things, has the temerity to fly an unrepentant sodomite un the face of a people that still remember what Christianity means.

Fifth Ancient Patriarchate BUMP.

27 posted on 01/12/2002 3:02:28 PM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruggers
How about the following:
Another person serving at the embassy held a meeting in November to encourage leaders of Romania's fledgling "gay movement.
I'm thinking this isin't so hot, if accurate.
28 posted on 01/12/2002 3:03:16 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
I don't know why Bush does this. Why doesn't he send a gay ambassador to an Islamic country? It's apparently okay to offend Christians but you have to kiss up to the countries that send us terrorists.
29 posted on 01/12/2002 3:05:43 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: GrandMoM
Queers will cause trouble everywhere the are!!
31 posted on 01/12/2002 3:06:23 PM PST by mbb bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
The article relies alsmost entirely on the assertions of one annonymous "source." There is no way to verify anything in it. At best this is an example of very sloppy journalism, and from a source that has its own ideological bias. Is there a different source out there for more information on this one?
32 posted on 01/12/2002 3:07:35 PM PST by irksome1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austim
The only real difference between the republicans and democrats is economics. Both parties are pro-gay, pro-abort--basically socially liberal. They don't represent me anymore, so why should I give them any more money?

They feel secure enough to play the religious right for fools, although they can't get elected without us. When the war winds down, I wonder if anyone will realize that no pro-life issue has been addressed--except of course the stem cell issue, which they waffled on.

33 posted on 01/12/2002 3:08:24 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: Ruggers
...flaunting of the relationship

I don't think people would care one way or the other if it wasn't being flaunted. Just for the record,
I would be just as uncomfortable if a heterosexual couple started french kissing on the dance floor.

35 posted on 01/12/2002 3:10:19 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ruggers
I live on the same planet as you.

I totally disagree with you because I don't think we should be instilling godless ideas on a country that holds their morals higher than our country does!

...and young person homosexulality is GODLESS!

check out the bible sometime

36 posted on 01/12/2002 3:11:46 PM PST by GrandMoM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
He is doing it to win over the gay vote. Helps the gays with normalization of their deviant behavior. Romania is a Catholic country that still holds to their religious views. Its insulting, inappropriate, and a slap in the face.
37 posted on 01/12/2002 3:12:09 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: Ruggers
'Flaunting' for a homosexual couple can be merely holding hands at an inappropriate time. I personally know of two homosexual couples, one female couple and one male couple, who are also friends of mine and they do not show their affection in front of others. They know it makes people uncomfortable. They know it would make me uncomfortable. Flaunting is not caring whether others are made to feel uncomfortable.
40 posted on 01/12/2002 3:20:51 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson