[Stultis]

My take (and he can jump in and speak for himself) is that vmatt is a pretty much across the board "anti-government" conservative populist. I don't have much use for these people, as they tend to be excessively paranoid, gratuitously lurid, and counter-productive to the larger conservative cause in their pursuit of lost causes. They are not willing to leverage their influence by coalition building and participation in viable political parties. They unintentionally help the enemy by allowing libs to associate conservatism with stupid conspiracy theories. Etc, etc, etc. But even if these folks are a pain in the ass, and even a liability, they are not "disruptors" in the sense you suggested, of infiltrating leftists.

[vmatt]

My take (and he can jump in and speak for himself) is that vmatt is a pretty much across the board "anti-government" conservative populist. I don't have much use for these people, as they tend to be excessively paranoid, gratuitously lurid, and counter-productive to the larger conservative cause in their pursuit of lost causes.

Are you threatening me?!$#&*(