Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marajade
By "did" I meant before one knew more about the issue.
Like that the issuance is common, state regulators still examine them (if the exemption is under 34.1c) and that FERC was still controlled by Clinton appointees at the time.

"blanket approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liability by Enron Energy " kinda jumps out at anyone who has been following the attempts to smear Bush with the issue.

vmatt did independent research and found something intriguing.

(If freepers insist he be punished, perhaps a good penalty would be to have him look for "enron AND waiver" in the Register for Clinton's term.
I looked and there are too many entries to begin to examine them all.)

79 posted on 01/12/2002 12:20:31 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
"vmatt did independent research and found something intriguing."

Intriguing is a lot different than suspicious.

81 posted on 01/12/2002 12:23:26 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: mrsmith
(If freepers insist he be punished, perhaps a good penalty would be to have him look for "enron AND waiver" in the Register for Clinton's term. I looked and there are too many entries to begin to examine them all.)

LOL!

89 posted on 01/12/2002 12:50:45 PM PST by vmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson