Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eva
I am not an expert on these matters, but it is my guess that these waivers are fairly routine, and allow for quicker price changes in a volatile market. faster price changes can work either way for the consumer, depending on which way the market is moving.

You are correct. However, a waiver for a company in Enron's ilk absolutely could not operate without one and without the waiver would have been required by regulation to disclose facts about their fiscal situation that would have exposed them.

173 posted on 01/14/2002 11:09:39 AM PST by vmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: vmatt
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Zond Development Corporation ) Docket No. ER97-2532-000
Zond Minnesota Development ) Docket No. ER97-2904-000
Corporation II )
NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF ORDER
(July 28, 1997)
Zond Development Corporation (Zond) and Zond Minnesota Development Corporation II (Zond Minnesota) are subsidiaries of Enron Corporation and are now affiliated with Portland General Electric Company. Zond and Zond Minnesota have filed applications requesting that the Commission authorize them to engage in wholesale power sales at market-based rates, and for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, Zond and Zond Minnesota requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities by Zond and Zond Minnesota. On July 17, 1997, the Commission issued an Order Conditionally Accepting For Filing Proposed Market-Based Rates (Order), in the above- docketed proceedings.

The Commission's July 17, 1997 Order granted the request for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in Ordering Paragraphs (F), (G), and (I):

(F) Within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, any person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by Zond and Zond Minnesota should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.

(G) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in Ordering Paragraph (F) above, Zond and Zond Minnesota are hereby authorized, pursuant to section 204 of the FPA, to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of Zond and Zond Minnesota, compatible with the public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.

177 posted on 01/14/2002 11:25:21 AM PST by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: vmatt
Enron is involved here, as the buyer. But I don't know what the whole thing means.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
SCC-L1, L.L.C. ) Docket No. ER99-1914-000 )
SCC-L2, L.L.C. ) Docket No. ER99-1915-000
) SCC-L3, L.L.C. ) Docket No. ER99-1942-000

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF ORDER
(April 26, 1999)

SCC-L1, L.L.C., SCC-L2, L.L.C., and SCC-L3, L.L.C. (collectively, Applicants) filed respective applications requesting that the Commission accept market-based rate tariffs, power purchase agreements (PPA's), and Interconnection Agreements (IA's). Under the PPAs, the Applicants will make wholesale power sales at market-based rates to Enron Power Marketing, Inc.(EPMI), a power-marketer. In addition, under the tariffs, the Applicants requested blanket authorization to sell at market-based rates electric energy generated in excess of the amounts scheduled by EPMI, and for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, Applicants requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities by Applicants. On April 15, 1999, the Commission issued an Order Conditionally Accepting For Filing Proposed Market-Based Rates (Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.

Et cetera...

178 posted on 01/14/2002 11:31:00 AM PST by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: vmatt
No, it would not have exposed the fiscal vulnerability of Enron, the problems were well hidden due to the government regulations which forced separate accounting of each division. One division might show a profit, but two might be showing losses and the overall net was never revealed.
188 posted on 01/14/2002 1:00:37 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson