PS: I am always alert for biased news coverage and even found fault with FoxNews when they hired Geraldo and Greta and have suspicions of O'Reilly. My primary news sources are c-span, freerepublic.com, Rush, Brit Hume in that order with daily reading of the NYTimes.com (stay abreast of progressive reporting;^) and occassional scanning of the other news networks
When I go to their internet site, I see a conspicuous absence of programming which includes President Bush. If it was not for Rintense's thread, many of us would think our president was meeting no one and going nowhere.
Do you think the current coverage is equivalent to the camera time they gave Clinton?