That has been my thought right from the "get go". I am sure that Enron has some (if not, a helluva lot of) political interests. But, any company that deals in oil and is worth what Enron is, excuse me was, worth would have those types of interest.
The liberal demoSTUPIDs can beat their drums all they want, but they will come to find that there was probably a lot more political "hank panky" between Enron and the Clinton administration vs. Enron and the Bush administration.
They will try to paint the "BIG OIL" connection, but I think that we are all a little tired of that by now.
Next thing you know, the DNC will be running adds saying that it was actually Bush and "his Enron cronies" that were in the truck that dragged James Byrd to death. Don't laugh, I wouldn't put it past them.
It wasn't Bush and his white redneck, black-people-hating Enron Texan buddies in that pickup truck? You should report this immediately to the NAACP-- they have conflicting information! : )
Liberal media will try to smear GW with this as guilt by association but at least on the surface it appears as if there was a bunch of Enron quid passed around for little or no quo. They had influence but got no action. Too bad about the employees. That rests squarely with the management of the company though.
Richard W.