Skip to comments.
Joseph I.Lieberman(D-CT)-Detailed Contributor Breakdown 1996 Election Cycle
Open Secrets.org ^
| ?/?/?? (January 11,2001)
| Staff
Posted on 01/11/2002 6:52:16 PM PST by Lady In Blue
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: firebrand; evilC; StarFan; MiaT; n.y.muggs; NYCVirago; ELS; Jhensy; NYC GOP Chick; stanz; paltz...
Tri-State ping!
21
posted on
01/11/2002 7:18:53 PM PST
by
nutmeg
To: Lady In Blue
My head is spinning -- he wasn't even up for re-election in 1996! This smells!
Comment #23 Removed by Moderator
Comment #24 Removed by Moderator
To: Lady In Blue
A little update on your info........ from Open Secrets.. Citigroup is the largest holder about $3 billion of unsecured debt for Enron.
JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN (D-CT)
Top Contributors2002
1 |
Citigroup Inc |
$112,546 |
2 |
United Technologies |
$62,000 |
3 |
Hartford Financial Services |
$49,700 |
4 |
New Democrat Network |
$48,398 |
5 |
Pfizer Inc |
$40,300 |
6 |
Richman Group |
$32,000 |
7 |
Aetna Inc |
$30,000 |
8 |
MacAndrews & Forbes |
$28,000 |
9 |
National Jewish Democratic Council |
$27,800 |
10 |
Apollo Management |
$26,000 |
10 |
Starwood Capital Group |
$26,000 |
12 |
Northeast Utilities |
$25,800 |
13 |
Purdue Frederick |
$25,000 |
14 |
Rite Aid Corp |
$24,000 |
15 |
National Westminster Bank |
$23,000 |
16 |
Paloma Partners |
$22,000 |
17 |
American International Group |
$20,000 |
17 |
Chase Enterprises |
$20,000 |
17 |
O&G Industries |
$20,000 |
17 |
Tomasso Brothers |
$20,000 |
2000
1 |
Citigroup Inc |
$59,296 |
2 |
United Technologies |
$36,000 |
3 |
Hartford Financial Services |
$29,850 |
4 |
New Democrat Network |
$27,198 |
5 |
Pfizer Inc |
$25,650 |
6 |
Aetna Inc |
$20,000 |
7 |
Richman Group |
$16,000 |
8 |
Northeast Utilities |
$15,900 |
9 |
American International Group |
$15,000 |
10 |
MacAndrews & Forbes |
$14,000 |
11 |
National Jewish Democratic Council |
$13,900 |
12 |
Apollo Management |
$13,000 |
12 |
Starwood Capital Group |
$13,000 |
14 |
General Electric |
$12,550 |
15 |
Purdue Frederick Co |
$12,500 |
16 |
Rite Aid Corp |
$12,000 |
17 |
Microsoft Corp |
$11,500 |
17 |
National Westminster Bank |
$11,500 |
19 |
Paloma Partners |
$11,000 |
19 |
Verizon Communications |
$11,000 |
1988
1 |
Citigroup Inc |
$54,350 |
2 |
Goldman, Sachs & Co |
$30,250 |
3 |
Merrill Lynch |
$28,250 |
4 |
Greenwich Capital Markets |
$22,500 |
5 |
MacAndrews & Forbes |
$20,250 |
6 |
Textron Inc |
$18,750 |
7 |
Equitable Companies |
$18,000 |
8 |
Guardsmark Inc |
$17,325 |
9 |
Aetna Inc |
$15,368 |
10 |
Pfizer Inc |
$14,550 |
11 |
Cigna Corp |
$14,500 |
12 |
United Technologies Corp |
$14,000 |
13 |
Apollo Advisors |
$12,500 |
13 |
Time Warner |
$12,500 |
15 |
Allen Holding Inc |
$12,300 |
16 |
League of Conservation Voters |
$12,000 |
16 |
Loral Corp |
$12,000 |
18 |
Milstein Properties |
$11,600 |
19 |
Walt Disney Co |
$11,350 |
20 |
Oxford Health Plans |
$11,250 |
20 |
Sullivan & Cromwell |
$11,250 |
|
HOW TO READ THIS CHART: This chart lists the top donors to each this member of Congress during the current election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organization's PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates. Typically, members of Congress draw their contributions from two main sources: PACs and lobbyists who give because of the member's position on key congressional committees, and local companies, unions and other organizations from their home district. Challengers tend to rely more heavily on home-state donors, since most PACs put most of their dollars behind incumbents.
METHODOLOGY: The organizations listed here came from two sources: either they were the sponsor of a PAC that donated to the member, or they were listed as individual donor's employer. Donors who give more than $200 must provide information on their occupation and employer.
In cases where two or more people from the same family contributed, the income-earner's occupation/employer is assigned to all family members. If, for instance, Henry Jones lists his employer as First National Bank, his wife Matilda lists "Homemaker" and 12-year old Tammy shows up as "Student," the Center would identify all their contributions as being related to the "First National Bank" since that's the source of the family's income.
NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for the 1997-2002 Senate election cycle and based on Federal Election Commission data released electronically on Thursday, November 01, 2001. Help! The numbers don't add up...")
Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the Center for Responsive Politics.
25
posted on
01/11/2002 7:26:19 PM PST
by
deport
To: Lady In Blue
Can't wait for the "Conscience of the Senate" to set up his lemonade stand in front of this White House. My only regret is that the Republican members on the committee are incapable of being as vicious as the rats were for 8 long, painful years.
26
posted on
01/11/2002 7:27:03 PM PST
by
Deb
To: seamole
Get more for your money. Give to the DNC.
27
posted on
01/11/2002 7:35:28 PM PST
by
calebcar
To: deport
GREAT FIND! Send it to Snow at Fox who cannot understand why this is headed back to the RATS and clintons!
To: Lady In Blue
Why did Hitlery only get $650? Something sounds fishy in here. Of course, right now I'm finishing up Barbara Olsen's Hell To Pay, and I'm getting suspicious of the unobvious things.
29
posted on
01/11/2002 7:51:14 PM PST
by
Slip18
To: PhiKapMom
Go ahead the link in 2002 takes you to that data. He maybe correct in that it may not be headed back there as it depends upon what gets investigated. I don't see the senate doing that much except stirring the pot as long as the dems have control. They'll hold some hearings and the respondents will have to refuse to answer because of the ongoing criminal investigations so they can selectively pick the questions and who to interview.
The real answers will come when the criminal investigation is completed and that can take a couple years or more to pull this kinda of data together... All of this just my opinion of course.
30
posted on
01/11/2002 7:51:18 PM PST
by
deport
To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
Thanks,SMEDLEYBUTLER.I didn't realize that.
To: Atticus
That's another one I missed! Thanks!
To: PhiKapMom
SMEDLEYBUTLER just said the same thing.Something's not right.Coupled with the Loral contribution.I read somewhere that ENRON execs introducted Clinton to Loral!
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
To: deport
All I can say is WOW! Thanks,deport.I'll have to keep an eye out on Citicorp for more info.
To: Deb
Can't wait for the "Conscience of the Senate" to set up his lemonade stand in front of this White House.
hehehe! I think we'll be waiting a long time for that to happen!lol!
To: Lady In Blue
Something really is not right! Have to wonder if Lieberman funneled this money elsewhere! It makes no sense but what does make sense is that he should recuse himself with the large donations from Citigroup who holds worthless notes from Enron!
To: deport
Snow seemed to only be interested in the Bush Administration but why not be interested in why LIE doesn't recuse himself since Citigroup owns a lot of worthless paper from Enron and they are his biggest contributors.
To: nutmeg;Dutchy; LongsforReagan; nancetc; #1CTYankee; .303 Brit; 2nd amendment mama; 2Trievers...
Bump
To: PhiKapMom
What scares me in all of this is the Securities/Investment section. Lots of money came from that sector. Goldman-Sachs and Merrill Lynch gave a lot of money to Joe.
40
posted on
01/11/2002 8:06:10 PM PST
by
Slip18
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson