Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joseph I.Lieberman(D-CT)-Detailed Contributor Breakdown 1996 Election Cycle
Open Secrets.org ^ | ?/?/?? (January 11,2001) | Staff

Posted on 01/11/2002 6:52:16 PM PST by Lady In Blue

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: firebrand; evilC; StarFan; MiaT; n.y.muggs; NYCVirago; ELS; Jhensy; NYC GOP Chick; stanz; paltz...
Tri-State ping!
21 posted on 01/11/2002 7:18:53 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
My head is spinning -- he wasn't even up for re-election in 1996! This smells!
22 posted on 01/11/2002 7:20:54 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Lady In Blue
A little update on your info........ from Open Secrets.. Citigroup is the largest holder about $3 billion of unsecured debt for Enron.


25 posted on 01/11/2002 7:26:19 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
Can't wait for the "Conscience of the Senate" to set up his lemonade stand in front of this White House. My only regret is that the Republican members on the committee are incapable of being as vicious as the rats were for 8 long, painful years.
26 posted on 01/11/2002 7:27:03 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Get more for your money. Give to the DNC.
27 posted on 01/11/2002 7:35:28 PM PST by calebcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: deport
GREAT FIND! Send it to Snow at Fox who cannot understand why this is headed back to the RATS and clintons!
28 posted on 01/11/2002 7:39:21 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
Why did Hitlery only get $650? Something sounds fishy in here. Of course, right now I'm finishing up Barbara Olsen's Hell To Pay, and I'm getting suspicious of the unobvious things.
29 posted on 01/11/2002 7:51:14 PM PST by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Go ahead the link in 2002 takes you to that data. He maybe correct in that it may not be headed back there as it depends upon what gets investigated. I don't see the senate doing that much except stirring the pot as long as the dems have control. They'll hold some hearings and the respondents will have to refuse to answer because of the ongoing criminal investigations so they can selectively pick the questions and who to interview.

The real answers will come when the criminal investigation is completed and that can take a couple years or more to pull this kinda of data together... All of this just my opinion of course.

30 posted on 01/11/2002 7:51:18 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
Thanks,SMEDLEYBUTLER.I didn't realize that.
31 posted on 01/11/2002 7:51:31 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Atticus
That's another one I missed! Thanks!
32 posted on 01/11/2002 7:52:29 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
SMEDLEYBUTLER just said the same thing.Something's not right.Coupled with the Loral contribution.I read somewhere that ENRON execs introducted Clinton to Loral!
33 posted on 01/11/2002 7:54:31 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: deport
All I can say is WOW! Thanks,deport.I'll have to keep an eye out on Citicorp for more info.
35 posted on 01/11/2002 7:56:36 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Can't wait for the "Conscience of the Senate" to set up his lemonade stand in front of this White House.


hehehe! I think we'll be waiting a long time for that to happen!lol!

36 posted on 01/11/2002 7:59:03 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
Something really is not right! Have to wonder if Lieberman funneled this money elsewhere! It makes no sense but what does make sense is that he should recuse himself with the large donations from Citigroup who holds worthless notes from Enron!
37 posted on 01/11/2002 7:59:43 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: deport
Snow seemed to only be interested in the Bush Administration but why not be interested in why LIE doesn't recuse himself since Citigroup owns a lot of worthless paper from Enron and they are his biggest contributors.
38 posted on 01/11/2002 8:02:21 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg;Dutchy; LongsforReagan; nancetc; #1CTYankee; .303 Brit; 2nd amendment mama; 2Trievers...
Bump
39 posted on 01/11/2002 8:04:19 PM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
What scares me in all of this is the Securities/Investment section. Lots of money came from that sector. Goldman-Sachs and Merrill Lynch gave a lot of money to Joe.
40 posted on 01/11/2002 8:06:10 PM PST by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson