[BUSHdude2000]

I never thought of Klayman as conservative. I always thought of him as non-partisan...he was going after Slick while Slick was in office, now he's going after Bush since Bush is in office. Many Republican party loyalists will turn on Klayman like they have on Drudge. My complaint with Klayman is that he seems to have about 2,000 lawsuits filed right now and they never seem to turn into anything.

[Miss Marple]

Ah, but why isn't he going after Senator Daschle? Or Senator Lieberman? Or multitudes of congressmen from Jesse Jackson, Jr. to David Bonior? Why only President Bush? I thought he was supposed to look for GOVERNMENT corruption, not do PRESIDENTIAL nit-picking. Exactly why are we supposed to be upset about this Enron thing?

Is it because President Bush took donations from Enron? As has been demonstrated, they gave a lot of money on both sides of the aisle.

Is it because Enron bought influence? Some influence...they wound up bankrupt.

Is it because the employees lost money in the 401K while the officers got to sell their stock? This apparently is legal, although reprehensible. It is not President Bush's fault, and O'Neill said they are going to be looking into changing the laws on 401K plans.

Now, if all the hot shot Wall Street people thought this was a good company, and apparently there were a lot who did, how is it that President Bush, who has been running a war and doesn't have time to look at individual stock reports, was supposed to KNOW that they were in trouble?

Oh...when O'Neill got the call? By then the money was gone.

So WHAT is Klayman investigating? Please explain, and it cannot be that Lay was a friend. I have had friends in my life that did some crummy things. I didn't know what they were doing until it had happened, and of course, they aren't now my friends, but nonetheless, I did know them.