[Dianna]

Howlin I have agreed with everything I have read from you on this subject. But there is one thing I think we ought to refrain from.

Several people are demanding solid proof as a standard to be able to make an allegation.

Without more info, that isn't possible. All I ask is some reasonable facimile of logic. And campaign cash+ illegal influence will never equal bankruptcy.

[Buckeroo]

Our President accumulated more money than any president (before him) for his campaign to the tune of 1/4 billion dollars. And still folks out there can't get a connection to reality.

[Howlin]

I was alluding to the fact that so far, there hasn't been one iota of proof of accusation that Bush had anything whatsoever to do with this; even the talking heads on TV, except the raving liberals, all say there is nothing to this and that the Dems are 'hoping' they can spin it into something to hang on Bush.

I guess I wasn't clear enough. I apologize. If we can't get proof, I guess at least some measure of guilt should be present.........but that's just me.......LOL.

[Howlin]

And campaign cash+ illegal influence will never equal bankruptcy.

Isn't that what I am saying? Maybe I'm not making it clear; IF, a big IF, Enron thought there were going to get some influence for all that money, I don't think bankruptcy is what they had in mine.