Skip to comments.
Conservatives (Judicial Watch) turn on Bush over Enron
The Telegraph (U.K.) ^
| 01/12/2002
| Ben Fenton
Posted on 01/11/2002 4:26:46 PM PST by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-244 next last
To: poet
Since I make a tidy fortune as a hedge fund manager,I feel qualified to state that if people pay attention to market signals, they would see when a stock isn't acting right, and Enron has been weak since December 2000, so that any news item was going to go in the direction of the trend.Plus, you're in the teeth of the nastiest bear marktet since 1981-'82, and people somehow think their stocks won't get hit?? Its a cruel world at times for investing, but the market knows more than any Federal regulator ever will, nor any cabinet member, too.
Comment #82 Removed by Moderator
To: jamesbond
Let me ask you this, if Judicial Watch is so "non-partisian" in it's approach, how in the world would this reporter get the idea that they are conservatives? And what about this quote,
"Mr. Fitton: "Conservatives are very uncomfortable about the relations between the Bush White House and Enron and I doubt you will see many coming forward to defend the conduct, at least so far."
Now, I expect to see a press release come out that Judicial Watch was unfairly smeared by the leftist UK Telegraph.....however, I'm not holding my breath.......
To: poet
My, my, my how we throw around words like "corruption". Whose "corruption"? Bush's? How so?
You must not mean Enron's since none of the employees could sell or trade their stock for only a brief period when the company was in the middle of changing and reorganizing their 401k carriers. It's all in their filings.
Maybe you mean Wall Street's "corruption" for creating and maintaining the hysterical atmosphere that surrounded the Enron phenom.
The truth is, when Mr. Daschle killed the Energy bill, that killed Enron because they became energy brokers with no product to broker and that took down the poor, tragic investors your heart breaks for. So you must mean the Democrat's "corruption" for destroying the 7th largest company in the country in order to get George Bush.
You seem to be jumping to conclusions you know nothing about, but you sure seem to have absorbed the exact information the Democrats wanted you to. Imagine that!
I suggest you spend more time hanging out on some of the financial web sites or CNBC during the trading day. The best is "Your World" on FOX. Of course you might come into contact with facts...scary stuff.
84
posted on
01/11/2002 7:17:12 PM PST
by
Deb
To: Deb
I heard that if California paid Enron what it owes it, there would be plenty of money for the employees, have you heard that?
85
posted on
01/11/2002 7:18:44 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: poet
The point is that all the 401(k) investors did not have a heads-up so they could sell their shares.January 1st: $82.00
October 15th: $13.00
That's a headsup for your A$$.
86
posted on
01/11/2002 7:20:21 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
I heard that if California paid Enron what it owes it, Oh say it ain't so. California is short of cash right now. Just ask Gov Davis. Are you trying to put pressure on the powers that be to raise my taxes or something?
87
posted on
01/11/2002 7:21:01 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Patriot76
Bush is good friends with those creeps. Is that what he's being officially *charged* with?
88
posted on
01/11/2002 7:22:05 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Miss Marple
Woohoo !!!!!!!! Good letter Miss M.
To: denydenydeny; ratcat
Even in this article, there isn't a word about Enron, is there, or did I miss something?
90
posted on
01/11/2002 7:24:00 PM PST
by
Howlin
Comment #91 Removed by Moderator
To: Deb; Miss Marple
As I saw somebody else say today, two things that have returned since Bush took office:
Homelessness
Investigative reporting
92
posted on
01/11/2002 7:26:58 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Pokey78; gopcapitalist; grlfrnd
I never thought of Klayman as conservative. I always thought of him as non-partisan...he was going after Slick while Slick was in office, now he's going after Bush since Bush is in office. Many Republican party loyalists will turn on Klayman like they have on Drudge. My complaint with Klayman is that he seems to have about 2,000 lawsuits filed right now and they never seem to turn into anything.
To: willyone
Honestly, you are so ill-informed, I hope you DO vote for the Dems.
Amnesty for illegals
A lie.
food stamps for illegals
Another lie.
94
posted on
01/11/2002 7:28:47 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: jamesbond
Judicial Watch watches for injustice and tries to right the wrongs done to America. You know, Klayman said something very close to that when he introduced himself in Judge Sauls' courtroom during the recount.
I bet those people are STILL laughing.
95
posted on
01/11/2002 7:31:08 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: A Citizen Reporter
I doubt you will see many coming forward to defend the conduct, at least so far." Fitton must not have a TV. ALL the GOP is defending Bush!
96
posted on
01/11/2002 7:33:01 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: jamesbond
" They are conservatives. They say that on the air all the time. That's different from being partisan." Newsflash! Because they say it, doesn't make it so. Try reading the entire thread again.
To: Torie
No.........No.............but that's what I heard!
98
posted on
01/11/2002 7:34:08 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Yep, that's what even the regulators out here have said. When it's all said and done I'll bet Enron will have done nothing wrong. I'd be willing to bet that even the claim their execs took millions while their company tanked will prove wrong.
The Democrats have been trying to sink a really big Texas company or get some Texas related scandal going for two years. If someone did a Google search of the words "Texas/execution/oil/cocaine" since GW declared his plans to run for prez, a series of books could be compiled from the articles.
99
posted on
01/11/2002 7:35:41 PM PST
by
Deb
To: Howlin
THAT depends on what your definition of "conservative" is....is....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-244 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson