RUN Luis, like ALWAYS.
I say there are NO indications. YOU are clearly the one who must provide proof that there are ... IF there are.
What's the problem ... can't find even ONE to cite? Not even ONE?
Here's your idea of a Court case.
You: Your honor, the prosecution charges that this man is a thief, and a liar!
Judge: Very well Mr. Klayman/Chooser, what proof do you have to back up these charges?
You: No your Honor, can this man PROVE that he's NOT a thief and a liar? No? He can't prove that he's not A thief and a liar? Then surely your Honor, he's guilty as charged. Arrest him!
Here's a clue, clueless.
When you accuse someone of something, which you are here, the burden of proof rests on your shoulders, not theirs.
BTW, BAC, the article way back at the start of this thread is about two, count them, two, DoJ investigations. Loral and Hughes.
Yeah, he's haulin' ass...he and his credibility are really starting to take the big hits now - Chooser, let's go ahead and patiently and decisively - knock-out this fraud of a man who doesn't believe in the Rule of Law! (he's down to his panties now... rofl
(Chooser, notice, only a couple other posters have come to Mr Fraud Gonzalez's aid. - - - low and behold, who are these two folks - Iwo and Howlin - KNOWN MOVER-ONERS and obstructors of justice!
Are you the girl from Forest Gump?
You're wasting time. You could be DIGGING up Ron Brown's body as we speak.