Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
(and to be specific, no, I don't work for Larry Klayman)(I'll find your reply soon I'm sure and in the meantime, I'll prepare the next set of questions)
298 posted on 01/19/2002 3:01:03 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
It's now dinner time at our house. I must take a recess. In the meantime, I presume that you'll find the above soon - and I'll return for more questioning within the hour; however, I'll leave you with question number 3:

Luis, do have any problem with the following to be correct and true. Yes or No?

********
JURISDICTION AND VENUE

19. Jurisdiction over this matter is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, as the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs.

20. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a)(2) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to Plaintiffs’ claims occurred in the District of Columbia.

21. Venue is also proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1401 because Defendant Loral could have brought suit against Defendant Schwartz in the District of Columbia

300 posted on 01/19/2002 3:21:50 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson