Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Native American Female Vet; backhoe; MeeknMing; flamefront; Lulu; LoneGreenEyeshade...
"Chase would you address reply #208?"

Well, the invite by Luis, to me - for a "segment" - is nice. I don't know. Have to think about that.
(I'm not fretting about being on live radio (or tele....as I've called in to C-Span - oh, probably 40 or so times, gotten through and talked on the air - - decisively and calmly - always stated exactly what I want to say, with a calm air about me (maybe not the first time, lol) - but, as far as debating the valued merits of the Loral Shareholders case and the valued merits of Larry Klayman's fine cases - and having now clearly observed that Luis doesn't care much for nor lend much credence to Klayman's cases filed....I think I'd get way to harsh ( & deservedly so!) and smoke 'em right off the air. (hence, thus, possibly damaging the fine image of FR!)

No, I don't think I'll do this show. (all the Dems reading all of this - are thinking "darn" - just missed a good chance to see an FR poster - smoke the FR guest speaker!!). - No, I don't think I'll do this on air gig with Luis nor say anything here - that might ***(will)*** - reflect badly on the good volunteer work Luis does for FR.
(or reflect poorly on FR - now if FR radio brings on another guest speaker who backs the Loral Shareholders case, then I'll accept an invite/and Luis could call-in - and then I could smoke him away, but not while Luis represents FR!)
If it was just another FR poster, no problem, fine - Hammer Time, Big Time, but I know that as soon as Luis spews out any unwarranted negatives about Klayman and his good cause, I'd most likely (would definitely) - get too harsh with him and blast 'em away, and send him reeling out of his chair and quivering down the hall along with his pen, pencil, papers and mic falling and rolling behind him.
No, I won't be doing any of this on air with Luis - because if I got to that point with him - and he in any manner discredits this fine Loral case - I'd make sure that I make him look pretty bad.
(Luis, here at FR and also at L.com, I have over the past two years had four or so lawyers - email me on how excellent the Loral Shareholders case is. My own personal friend and attorney - has reviewed this Loral Shareholders case when I was at his home for a relaxing social visit and he too - stated that the Loral case has great merit and he'd sure like to be the attorney to bring this case to court (as he knows that he would "win it" )

Now, since Luis is most likely backing (going along with) this current administrations lead of - not investigating Loral and investigating the just charges in this Loral Shareholders case - and since it appears that Luis will not even be giving us his take on this Loral case - and that it appears that Luis is - and will - go to "any length" to protect whatever this current administration does, about this Loral matter - if all of this is Luis's stance, then shame on him. - But if someone else - comes to the FR mic - someone who backs the Loral case - or is at least neutral - concerning the allegations in this Loral case...then I'd call in for a segment. I know that if I am the one who goes up against Luis ... I'll do a quick, splendid job (and a decisive one) - of destroying this man's image - for speaking negatively of this Loral case.

I also have noticed that folks have - many times in this thread - called for Luis Gonzalez to give everyone his take on the Loral Shareholders case!
It has been days now - and Luis has still not posted - Anything what-so-ever as to his thoughts on this Loral case. This in and of itself is very perplexing/revealing!

[by the way Luis, just having stated what I've stated above- should give you a Stong hint - that you need to - finally, give every reader here - your position on the merits of this Judicial Watch Loral Shareholders case. You have yet to do so after being asked many times to do so. Luis, this is very suspect!]

233 posted on 01/18/2002 7:47:46 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez; Native American Female Vet
"...you need to - finally, give every reader here - your position on the merits
of this Judicial Watch Loral Shareholders case.
You have yet to do
so after being asked many times
to do so. Luis, this is very suspect!"

234 posted on 01/18/2002 7:50:42 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

To: ChaseR
I do not blame you for not going on the show, but I know you would do VERY well. I could never do a show like that I get to flustered and I also have a potty mouth when I get mad :-)
237 posted on 01/18/2002 8:06:36 AM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

To: ChaseR
"...speaking negatively of this Loral case."That's a lie, quote me, show me post and date.

"I know that if I am the one who goes up against Luis ... I'll do a quick, splendid job (and a decisive one) - of destroying this man's image..."

My! But you talk a good fight. Ali used to at least get in the ring and back up his mouth with his fists.

247 posted on 01/18/2002 10:24:38 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

To: ChaseR
Thanks for the ping. A lot to read here.

Jen

305 posted on 01/19/2002 4:15:40 PM PST by IVote2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson