Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expose
Interesting. One president gets massive contributions from a company to approval technology transfers from a company who puts Red China a generation ahead in a nuclear threat against everyone in America. They get mentioned in the London-based Financial Times and a slap on the wrist.

Another president gets moderate contributions from an energy company which is allowed to go bankrupt. Stockholders, employees and creditors (but not the entire country) suffer financial losses. They get calls for Senate investigations, endless wire stories and carried on all the domestic media 24-7.

What's wrong with this picture?

10 posted on 01/11/2002 2:32:33 PM PST by Rubber Duckie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rubber Duckie
What's wrong with this picture?

What is wrong is that there is no justice at Justice. Ashcroft disbanded the campaign finance task force which should have investigated this well as all the other criminal activties associated with Chinagate and the rest.

So, how much of an improvement is a change form obstructing justice, as Reno did, and ignoring justice as Ashcroft is doing?

Of course the "Bush....right or wrong, Bush" people don't like us to say anything about it, and they can jump through rhetorical hoops with a grace that doesn't match Clinton's but still isn't too bad when it comes to Janet Ashcroft doing a little obstructing of his own regarding the stuff Burton seeks.

21 posted on 01/11/2002 3:01:26 PM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson