Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Loral fined $14m over China missiles claim{Treason is cheap these days…}
ft.com ^ | By Edward Alden and Peter Spiegel

Posted on 01/11/2002 2:08:31 PM PST by expose

Loral fined $14m over China missiles claim

By Edward Alden and Peter Spiegel in Washington

Loral, the US satellite company, said it would pay $14m to the US State Department to settle a claim that it improperly gave technical information to China that may have aided that country's nuclear missile programme.

Loral also said the Justice Department had ended its investigation of the company and would not pursue any criminal charges.

The fine marks the last chapter in a bitter political battle in Washington in which Republicans alleged that during the Clinton administration the US had turned a blind eye to actions by Loral and other satellite makers that may have threatened national security.

Loral agreed to the fine, which will be spread out over seven years, without admitting or denying the government's charges.

The investigation arose out of the 1996 explosion of a Chinese rocket carrying one of Loral's Intelsat satellites. Loral subsequently took part in a technical investigation of the launch failure, which it inadvertently shared with the Chinese. The US Defence Department found that the technical data given to China may have helped the Chinese improve the accuracy of their military rockets and missiles, which use similar technology. Experts have since questioned whether anything of military value was given to China.

Bernard Schwartz, Loral chief executive, said on Wednesday the data were mistakenly sent to China by a Loral employee without approval by the US government, and expressed regret. He said the company had since greatly improved its oversight.

The Loral incident led to a detailed congressional investigation, which concluded China had been stealing an array of US military secrets. It resulted in severe restrictions on US satellite exports imposed in 1999.

The Justice Department had also been investigating a separate incident involving Hughes Electronics, another US satellite maker. Richard Dore, a Hughes spokesman, said on Wednesday the company had also been informed by Justice that no criminal charges would be filed.

But Hughes lawyers will meet State Department officials this month to discuss their own settlement of the matter and whether a fine will be necessary. "We've contended all along that we followed the government guidelines," said Mr Dore.

Hughes was accused of helping improve Chinese rocket and missile technology while investigating launch failures. The satellite-building unit of Hughes, Hughes Space and Communications, was sold to Boeing in 2000, but Hughes retained liability for the technology transfer investigation.

Lockheed Martin also agreed to pay $13m in 2000 after a company it acquired was accused of helping a Hong Kong company with ties to Beijing. <P.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; chinastuff; enronlist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-407 next last
To: VA Advogado
"...its over. Close the book Chase." We'll see. (you're forgetting about the SEC/Loral is down to $2.58 or so)
41 posted on 01/11/2002 8:15:49 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
"...care more about irritating pebbles in their shoes..."
rofl/bump
42 posted on 01/11/2002 8:16:58 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
These don't look like the same allegations of illegal sales that the Loral suit is about. Are they?
43 posted on 01/11/2002 8:21:54 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
These don't look like the same allegations of illegal sales that the Loral suit is about. Are they?
44 posted on 01/11/2002 8:23:47 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
an evening bump here!
45 posted on 01/11/2002 8:25:40 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
These don't look like the same allegations of illegal sales that the Loral suit is about. Are they?

I might be in error, yes, I might be...but please further expose my error.

46 posted on 01/11/2002 8:35:56 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
I mean, I've seen you post a lot of information in previous threads. Talk to us...
47 posted on 01/11/2002 8:36:53 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
and a Missile Guidance bump to you - bttt
48 posted on 01/11/2002 8:37:35 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
I just vaguely recall that the Loral suit was about sales that Clinton had approved in exchange for campaign contributions.

These acts appear to be violations of the law unrelated to Clinton or campaign contributions.

49 posted on 01/11/2002 9:06:49 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bayourod; backhoe; goldilucky
(so many scandals/so much blurr/so much to EXPOSE/)bttt
50 posted on 01/11/2002 9:29:04 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
blah blah blah. its over

"Blah blah blah"?

My goodness, VA, here I compliment you guys on your rhetorical skills in justifying Bush/Ashcroft's ignoring the pursuit of justice and that's your comment?

I know you guys can do better.

51 posted on 01/12/2002 3:30:03 AM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: ChaseR
bump
53 posted on 01/13/2002 7:57:02 PM PST by expose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
"I just vaguely recall that the Loral suit was
about sales that Clinton had approved in exchange for campaign contributions."

49 posted on 1/11/02 10:06 PM Pacific by bayourod

Taking into acct that you just vaguely recall this all important Loral Shareholders case,
(and knowing that this can be easily remedied)
do everyone a favor today -
go ahead and click on this devastating case which I've posted below -
review it throughly - then report back to us - as to what you how you view the allegations in this case. Thanks:

HILLARY CLINTON -U. S. SENATOR- IS A KEY DEFENDENT IN LORAL SHAREHOLERS CASE ie. CHINAGATE


54 posted on 01/14/2002 6:16:56 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied; goldilucky; ALOHA RONNIE; Snow Bunny; Black Jade; abigail2; Ragtime Cowgirl; dennisw...
Knowing that this Loral Shareholders case is the our countries last chance for a Chinagate investigation -
-let's all give a bump in anticipation of what bayourod will have to say when he's finished reviewing this Loral case.
Let's see if he comes to the same conclusion we all have about the just and devastating allegations in this ongoing case.
(those who don't have time to post comments, please leave your bump/help lurkers find this- Thank you everyone/BTTT
55 posted on 01/14/2002 7:04:21 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
early morning typo/bump:
"... review it throughly ...as to how you view the allegations in this case.Thanks"
56 posted on 01/14/2002 7:08:15 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
bump
57 posted on 01/14/2002 7:08:32 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: all
2nd early morning typo/bump
"Knowing that this Loral Shareholders case is our countries last chance for a Chinagate investigation - -let's all give a bump"
58 posted on 01/14/2002 7:10:10 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
Thanks Free the USA; I pinged over 100 folks, and I'm hoping for ....over 100 comments and pings. This Clinton/Gore Chinagate case - surely deserves them/BTTT
59 posted on 01/14/2002 7:11:37 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
bump
60 posted on 01/14/2002 7:13:03 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-407 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson