I appreciate the time and research that went into your response and the questions you tried to raise. But, to cut to the bottom line...you speak nonsense.
If you want to go for President Bush's jugular, find a direct route, or at least stay with the democrat's current talking points.
Regarding Enron, my points are simple. There is no logical, ethical or legal claim of malfeasance to lay at the feet of our president, George W. Bush.
Enron did themselves in. I will leave it to the SEC and the Justice Department to uncover how they accomplished this.
I am not (at this point) interested in exposing the profound and certifiable influence of the former Govenor of Texas, Ann Richards, and the Clinton/Gore administration on Enron's meteoric rise.
I am not here to debate the potential value of a cooperative alliance between business & govenment.
I am simply stating that inspite of their contribution to the Bush presidential campaign, Enron did not receive a quid pro quo.
George W. Bush did not comprosmise his ethics or principles to bail out a financial contributor. As foreign as not bailing out a contributor may be to most democrats, it is, I assure you, an ethical position....and one that will return this government to the position of respect and trust that our founding fathers had in mind.
History is wonderful. Don't lose sight of it. But, please, join us in the present.
That's the same we heard from the previous slime in the WH.