Skip to comments.
Enron's ties with the Bush administration
AP
| 1/11/02
Posted on 01/11/2002 9:24:51 AM PST by Native American Female Vet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: Native American Female Vet
FLASHBACK: CLINTON OFFICIAL MET WITH ENRON CHAIRMAN; $100,000 CASH DONATION TO DEMOCRATS TIMED TO PLANT APPROVAL
TIME MAGAZINE
SEPTEMBER 1, 1997
On Nov. 22, 1995 President Clinton scrawled an FYI note to chief of staff Mack McLarty, enclosing a newspaper article on Enron Corp. and the vicissitudes of its $3 billion power-plant project in India.
McLarty then reached out to Enron's chairman, Ken Lay, and over the next nine months closely monitored the project with the U.S. ambassador to New Delhi, keeping Lay informed of the Administration's efforts, according to White House documents reviewed by TIME magazine.
In June 1996, four days before India granted final approval to Enron's controversial $3 billion power-plant project, Enron's gave $100,000 to President Clinton's party.
Enron denies that its gift was repayment for Clinton's attention, and White House special counsel Lanny Davis says McLarty acted out of concern for a major U.S. investment overseas, TIME's Michael Weisskopf reported.
****
DRUDGE NOTE: McLarty was later hired by Enron. Lay also played golf with President Bill Clinton and slept in the Clinton White House. A master of political manipulation of both parties, Lay served as an adviser to the Clinton White House on energy issues. The Clinton administration, in turn, helped Enron get a contract for a gas pipeline in Mozambique and other projects, according to reports.
END
2
posted on
01/11/2002 9:28:24 AM PST
by
jimkress
To: Native American Female Vet
OK Clymeriated Presstitutes, let's see the same article for the 'Toon and the Rats....
3
posted on
01/11/2002 9:29:16 AM PST
by
eureka!
To: Native American Female Vet
4
posted on
01/11/2002 9:29:17 AM PST
by
angkor
To: Native American Female Vet
The headline is inaccurate. Many of the items describe ties to the bush CAMPAIGN". Which is not the Bush administration.
To: jimkress
I've heard reports of Enron using threats of withholding US aid and loan packages to "sweeten" some of their overseas dealings. I bet that doesn't get much air time.
6
posted on
01/11/2002 9:33:51 AM PST
by
steve50
To: Native American Female Vet
7
posted on
01/11/2002 9:33:52 AM PST
by
Slyfox
To: Native American Female Vet
Here it is one more time.
Leiberman's biggest contributor in recent years is Citigroup. Citigroup is also Enron's largest unsecured creditor to the tune of $3 billion.
Leiberman is now investigating a company that owes his biggest contributor $3 billion. Someone needs to ask Senator Leiberman what conversations he has had with Citigroup about Enron.
8
posted on
01/11/2002 9:36:36 AM PST
by
Pete
To: Native American Female Vet
I hate to tell you but Democratic Congressman Henry Waxman has accused the Bush administration of doing nothing in response to Enron calls to the White House. Doing nothing? How does doing nothing make the Bush administration guilty of something? I hope you read post #2. Drudge is killing the Demos.LOL!!!!!
9
posted on
01/11/2002 9:38:34 AM PST
by
hflynn
To: Native American Female Vet
Most went to GOP causesSince when are Clinton,
Gore,
Daschle,
Gephardt,
HRC, and many other dimocrats----------
members of the GOP?
To: Pete
Pete do you have a link for that tidbit.... I'd appreciate it.
11
posted on
01/11/2002 9:41:40 AM PST
by
deport
To: isthisnickcool
I think that argument is approaching "it depends on what the meaning of "is" is".
Let them do a complete investigation. With Anderson destroying documents the justice department should have some serious leverage on some good ole boys there, lets see if they use it. If not, it's a coverup, or more likely a protection racket.
12
posted on
01/11/2002 9:42:13 AM PST
by
steve50
To: jimkress;Enron_List
Indexing
To: Native American Female Vet
Kenneth Lay called Don Evans and Paul O'Neill
eleven days after the 9/11 attack to inform them in general of Enron's financial troubles. Lay did not go into detail, did not ask for a bail-out, and was not offered ANYTHING by either Secretary. Why? Because according to Paul O'Neill, there is nothing the federal government can do nor should do in a situation like this--Enron has do deal with their own financial problems just like O'Neill had to when he was a CEO.
Neither Evans nor O'Neill informed President Bush about these phone calls until last week. Why? It was only 11 days after the WTC/Pentagon attacks, andPresident Bush was in the process of launching a war. The Secretaries took Lay's calls, listened, offered nothing, and that was the end of the matter.
This is all SoreLoserman-style flatulence by left-wing reporters (is there any other kind?), egged on by embittered Dumbocrat operatives like Paul BUG ala, James, CarVILE, and (no doubt) Senator Cottage Cheese Ankles.
To: Native American Female Vet
And? So what? is hiring people that were once associated with a company that is now bankrupt illegal? Again, what is the issue here?
To: Native American Female Vet
.......Most went to GOP causes. ........
Darn and they still went belly up.... Does that mean the democrats are selling out too cheap.
Cheney meetings did you say....... Well lets see.
- Matalin Details Cheney-Enron Meetings
16
posted on
01/11/2002 9:49:22 AM PST
by
deport
To: Wyatt's Torch
I guess the upside is that this seems to be the whole of it. If this is the worst of it, then this is nothing.
17
posted on
01/11/2002 9:49:38 AM PST
by
paul544
To: Wyatt's Torch
I guess the upside is that this seems to be the whole of it. If this is the worst of it, then this is nothing.
18
posted on
01/11/2002 9:49:39 AM PST
by
paul544
To: paul544
guess the upside is that this seems to be the whole of it. If this is the worst of it, then this is nothing.Yes, pretty lame. I don't think the public is going to care much either. They would need an intern, a cigar and a blue dress to garner more interest. It's all a big YAWN!
To: deport
Pete do you have a link for that tidbit.... I'd appreciate it. Actually, I figured it out myself. Here is the documentation.
The following quote is from this article.
Enron reported in its court filing yesterday that Citigroup's Citibank unit is its largest unsecured creditor, with two loans totaling $3 billion.
Leiberman's campaign contributions can be found at opensecrets.org. Click here and search on Lieberman
2002 Race for Senate: Citigroup $112,546 top contributor - (next was United Tech at $62000
2000 Race for Senate: Citigroup $59,296 top contributor - (next was United Tech at $36,000)
1998 Race for Senate: Citigroup $54,350 top contributor - (next was Goldman Sachs at $30,350)
The first time Citigroup shows up is in 1998 and, since then, they have been the top contributor.
20
posted on
01/11/2002 9:56:43 AM PST
by
Pete
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson