Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stanz
"Throwback?"

"Ledley also noted that there were no vertebrae or even cartilaginous elements in the so-called “caudal appendage."

I think a real, functioning "throwback" tail would required something more solid in it? Can't hang from trees or wag much with some soft, limp skin growth.

59 posted on 01/11/2002 8:06:47 AM PST by pollwatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: pollwatcher
My comments were:

This occurs rarely, but the retaining of a caudal appendage (in this case, I'm not sure if it is one judging on the position).....

yes, it would be a "throwback" if vertebral structures WERE present.

66 posted on 01/11/2002 8:30:19 AM PST by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson