Skip to comments.
ENRON BACKSTORY THREAD II: Clinton-Gore, Ron Brown, Lippo, PLA
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
| Sunday Dec. 9, 2001
| DC-based British journalist and political observer
Posted on 01/10/2002 6:17:17 PM PST by Liz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Liz
Good post Liz . Anyone who cannot connect the logical dot's or is not teachable , screw them . You did a good thing posting this again !
41
posted on
01/10/2002 8:06:15 PM PST
by
Ben Bolt
To: Liz
It's no wonder why ENRON went belly up at the hands of the executives! Their days of having X42 and his Cabinet in their hip pocket came to an end when GWB took over. I have said many times that it will take years to uncover just how much damage X42 and his administration has done to this country. I don't think any of us know half of the corruption involving Bill and Hillary.
The Clinton's spent 8 years in the White House serving only themselves, this is what the difference is between GWB's Administration and X42's. GWB's assembled a TOP NOTCH Cabinet that would best serve the country, Bill Klinton chose a Cabinet that would best serve him. This is exactly what seperates Leader from a Loser.
42
posted on
01/10/2002 8:14:06 PM PST
by
MJY1288
To: Liz
I knew that GWB had to be behind it all somehow!!
To: Liz
Now I have no problem believing the questions some FReepers had about that mysterious round hole in Ron Brown's head. It's all starting to evolve into some really nasty avenues!
Rush said something today - hinting that the Dems really shouldn't want to open this can of worms. There's more of this to come, I'm sure. Klintoon has flies swarming around him from the stench. Him and all his crooked cronies.
Maybe THIS is one of the reasons Bush etal, have hedged about investigating Klintoon... Like they knew something like this was sure to break anyway. They were just waiting for that ba$tard's house of cards to start collapsing!
And of course, we taxpayers always end up taking it in the shorts.
Thanks, Liz. I missed the first post.
To: Liz
Hay, what gives?
That ignoramus Bush got the Supreme Court in his daddies pocket and who really cares if Clinton really raped that gal or not he was a great president. Cliton had nothing to do with China geten missile secreats, but Bush really did steal all of Endruns money. I know because NPR and ABC and CBS and NBC said so and theys been telling me whats right so far, and I know theyll keep doing what theys been doing. Thanks for taking my call on the Republican line So now its a democrats turn.
45
posted on
01/10/2002 8:55:21 PM PST
by
Dale 1
To: Humidston
The can of worms might include Klintoon AND Bush! Have you read the Marc Rich link above?
To: MJY1288
The Clinton's spent 8 years in the White House serving only themselves, this is what the difference is between GWB's Administration and X42's. GWB's assembled a TOP NOTCH Cabinet that would best serve the countryLook at the GWB administration and its links to Enron!
To: Liz
Bump Bump Bump
48
posted on
01/10/2002 9:23:48 PM PST
by
Slyfox
To: Dale 1
To: Norn Iron
I have, and just because ENRON consulted with and supported the Presidents Campaign, that doesn't mean there was any wrong doing. After all, ENRON was one of the biggest energy corperations in the world. They would be stupid not to engage and support a candidate and after all, they gave to lots of political campaigns. Where is the crime?
50
posted on
01/10/2002 9:40:49 PM PST
by
MJY1288
To: Liz
What an engagingly naive group we have here. So Clinton and crew exercised a little political muscle. What are contributions for anyway? I suppose Enron wouldn't have engaged in their hanky-panky if it wasn't that the devil (Clinton) made them do it. Wouldn't have curried and received political favors. Wouldn't have sought a favorable energy policy. Much effort is required to constantly validate contempt. What a lucky coincidence.
To: Norn Iron
WOW, a link and article from a Socialist, Anarchist website that bashes the POTUS, ........ GO FIGURE
52
posted on
01/10/2002 9:50:06 PM PST
by
MJY1288
To: MJY1288
Whoa, somebody must have left the gate open at Wackos Unlimited!
To: dorben
Good post Liz . Anyone who cannot connect the logical dot's or is not teachable , screw them. I assume you meant this about me but didn't have the guts to copy me for discussion. Fair enough, I can deal with your compulsion towards cowardice.
Now, about your point on the logical dot connecting...the first lesson anyone learns about logic is to throw away bias, unsubstatiated "facts" and deal only in what is known. Now, since you've included yourself why don't you show us the beef, dorbean?
54
posted on
01/10/2002 10:27:57 PM PST
by
Roebucks
To: Liz
I'll wait and see how far this gets before the "official kibosh" gets put on it. Can't dig too deep and all...
Got to keep those "horses and men" milling about smartly.
To: MJY1288
Folks who call the British Ulster Province "norn iron" are wont to provide hitlerist-marxist-gangster links in support of their "ideas."
To: Roebucks;dorben
I assume you meant this about me....Roebucks, a little paranoid today? Better go take your prozak.
To: rwfromkansas
58
posted on
01/11/2002 1:31:53 AM PST
by
backhoe
To: Goatroper
|
T H E C E N T E R F O R R E S P O N S I V E P O L I T I C S
Enron Total Contributions, 1989-2001*
Back to Alert
Election Cycle |
Total Contributions |
Soft Money Contributions |
Contributions from PACs |
Contributions from Individuals |
% to Dems |
% to Repubs |
1990 |
$163,250 |
$0 |
$130,250 |
$33,000 |
42% |
58% |
1992 |
$281,009 |
$75,109 |
$130,550 |
$75,350 |
42% |
58% |
1994 |
$520,996 |
$136,292 |
$189,565 |
$195,139 |
42% |
58% |
1996 |
$1,141,016 |
$687,445 |
$171,671 |
$281,900 |
18% |
81% |
1998 |
$1,049,942 |
$691,950 |
$212,643 |
$145,349 |
21% |
79% |
2000 |
$2,441,398 |
$1,671,555 |
$280,043 |
$489,800 |
28% |
72% |
2002 |
$172,859 |
$124,059 |
$32,000 |
$16,800 |
11% |
88% |
TOTAL |
$5,770,470 |
$3,386,410 |
$1,146,722 |
$1,237,338 |
27% |
73% |
NOTE: Soft money contributions were not publicly disclosed until the 1991-92 election cycle. *Based on FEC data downloaded 11/1/01. |
|
|
59
posted on
01/11/2002 1:34:33 AM PST
by
angkor
To: TLBSHOW
60
posted on
01/11/2002 1:34:38 AM PST
by
backhoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson