Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal Immigrants
New York Times ^

Posted on 01/09/2002 5:00:20 PM PST by RCW2001



January 9, 2002

White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal Immigrants

By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON, Jan. 9 — The Bush administration proposed today to restore food stamps to legal immigrants, whose eligibility for benefits was severely restricted by the 1996 welfare law.

The White House said that in the budget President Bush will send to Congress in early February, at least 363,000 people would qualify for food stamps under a proposal that would cost the federal government $2.1 billion over 10 years.

The proposal, or something like it, has an excellent chance of becoming law. The Senate is considering such changes as part of a far-reaching bill to reauthorize farm and nutrition programs.

The welfare bill passed by Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 made immigrants ineligible for food stamps and many other forms of assistance financed with federal money. Supporters of the ban, most of them Republicans, argued that federal benefits drew immigrants to the United States and then discouraged their work effort after they got here.

But today, with the country in a recession that is hurting immigrants, and fighting a war on terrorism that has targeted some immigrants, Mr. Bush is looking for ways to show his commitment to them as well as to addressing domestic problems — a transition his father failed to make effectively a decade ago after the Persian Gulf war. Moreover, many of those who would benefit from the food stamps are Hispanic Americans, whom the White House is ardently courting.

As Mr. Clinton did as well, President Bush is selectively disclosing parts of his budget in advance — specifically, those proposals likely to win political support for the president.

Antihunger groups and Hispanic groups were enthusiastic about Mr. Bush's proposal, without suggesting any ulterior motive.

"This is an enormous step forward, for which the president should be congratulated," said Cecilia Munoz, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino civil rights group. "Mr. Bush did not speak out on this in the presidential campaign, and he had not done so since he assumed office."

As governor of Texas and as president, Mr. Bush has taken pride in his good relations with Hispanic Americans, although the Republican Party is split on how aggressively to go after Hispanic voters.

Some Republicans have alienated Hispanic voters with proposals for a restrictionist immigration policy. But Karl Rove, the president's senior political adviser, said earlier this year that capturing a bigger share of Hispanic voters was "our mission and our goal" and would require assiduous work by "all of us in every way."

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, the federal government has detained more than 1,100 noncitizens for questioning and has stepped up enforcement of the immigration laws. Mr. Bush has insisted that he is waging war on terrorists, not immigrants, and his food stamp proposal can be cited to support that claim.

James D. Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, an antihunger group, said: "It's really positive that the administration wants to extend food stamp benefits to this group of legal immigrants. We are delighted the administration is supporting this."

The economy is much worse now than in 1996, when Mr. Clinton signed the welfare bill. "Immigrants have been hit hard by the economic downturn," Ms. Munoz said, "and there's no safety net for those who arrived after 1996."

Welfare and food stamp rolls have plummeted since 1996, and members of Congress express much less concern now about being overwhelmed with the programs' cost, even though budget surpluses have evaporated and Mr. Bush has emphasized holding down costs. Also, advocates for immigrants have made some progress on Capitol Hill by appealing to the American sense of justice.

"This will restore justice to people who work hard, pay taxes and play an incredibly important role in our economy," Ms. Munoz said. "It is unreasonable for somebody who works hard and is laid off to have no access to food for his family."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-265 next last
Comment #221 Removed by Moderator

To: SentryoverAmerica;WarHawk42;WRhine;Sabertooth;kwyjibo;max61;LADY J;Crabcake;anniegetyourgun...
Write President Bush and tell him how you feel...here's his email address. Writing the White House takes about as much time as posting on FR, and just might get the point across.

I don't care if you've gotten sick of writing, doing nothing will get you just that.

LTS

222 posted on 01/10/2002 8:46:37 PM PST by Liberty Tree Surgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #223 Removed by Moderator

To: america-rules
The foodstamp program costs we're talking about here is 500,000 million per year and this money would go to some other pork if it wasn't used for this.

It's not the money that is at issue. It is the principle of providing welfare to people who don't belong in the U.S. to begin with and how this encourages more immigrants to come here anyway they can to take advantage of our taxpayer financed give aways programs. That is the issue.

224 posted on 01/10/2002 8:56:59 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I voted for Bush and will probably vote for him again; however, there is a lot of ground to cover in the next 3 years. If a decent conservative ran, I have to admit I would reconsider voting for Bush, and this is solely because of his immigration policies. I know he is trying to think globally, but I feel Americans are at immediate risk by continuing to keep the borders wide open to any and all who come in to leach off the taxpayers and kill us, with the government's approval. I'll decide who I'll vote for when I see the line up. Right now Bush isn't looking so good, but he still looks a hell of a lot better than the other candidates being bantered around right now.
225 posted on 01/10/2002 9:06:57 PM PST by ZDaphne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
FR having that much power is a great dream, but directly contacting our government has a lot more punch. On the other hand, I would not ever suggest in an email that I will not vote for him if this passes.

As I live in Texas, this might not matter. But if I move to Ohio, I can work to swing that state away from him, since it didn't go as much for him as Texas. And he has to know that people will do that. At some point, rather than stay home, true conservatives will work to tip the country so far left that the silent, apathetic majority will have no choice but to make a choice.

LTS

226 posted on 01/10/2002 9:08:34 PM PST by Liberty Tree Surgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Tree Surgeon
I wrote over a month ago; received a boiler plate response referring me to "Welcome to the White House."
227 posted on 01/10/2002 9:10:25 PM PST by ZDaphne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: ZDaphne
Write more often. Most ISPs give you multiple email accounts. Use them all! Who says we can't freep the White House. Also, you may want to write the Republican National Committee, by going to this email address.

LTS

228 posted on 01/10/2002 9:16:24 PM PST by Liberty Tree Surgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Tree Surgeon
So noted in my address book. Will use in the future. Thanks.
229 posted on 01/10/2002 9:21:47 PM PST by ZDaphne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

Comment #230 Removed by Moderator

To: HamblinRoger
How can this be aimed at the Mexican vote? Everyone knows that they are the hardest working people on earth and only come here because Americans don't want to work. This has to be aimed at someone else.
231 posted on 01/10/2002 9:58:02 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Bush is so predictable.   Here we go again.

WarHawk42

232 posted on 01/10/2002 10:08:24 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
How can this be aimed at the Mexican vote? Everyone knows that they are the hardest working people on earth and only come here because Americans don't want to work.

You are joking right? If not, take a trip to Mexico sometime and observe the industrious nature of this people. LOL. And as for coming here to work, while many Mexicans do just that, many are also on every conceivable welfare program imaginable and are getting the politicians who cater to them to create new ones for them all the time. I saw some of your posts before on this thread and assumed you were being cynical. Am I right?

233 posted on 01/10/2002 10:08:54 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
la raza
HATES whitey!

you suck on this one dubya!
(remember pop saying 'read my lips'?)

234 posted on 01/10/2002 10:12:21 PM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hemlock
shouldn't your screen name be 'hem-roid'?
235 posted on 01/10/2002 10:14:46 PM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
You are right
236 posted on 01/10/2002 10:15:05 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: ZDaphne; Liberty Tree Surgeon; WRhine
Dear Mr. President,
Please don't surrender on immigration...


237 posted on 01/10/2002 10:22:23 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

Comment #238 Removed by Moderator

To: Crabcake
But all the Mexican groups and "open borders" people say no Mexican ever comes here and goes on welfare.
239 posted on 01/10/2002 10:50:09 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Dialup Llama
If he keeps this up conservatives may not vote for him either. He is playing a risky game, sending this to a Congress that is nervous about immigration at present, he may hope that they refuse to pass it, which he may think will make him look good to those minorities that usually vote demoncratic.

He is banking on losing a small number of the more conservative of his base and replacing them with many more minority and liberal votes, that is plain to see. He is counting on the fact that conservatives have no place else to go so they will be forced to vote for him anyway.

Only that Nov. 7th will tell the tale of if he is right or not. I hope he finds out that he is wrong, wrong, wrong from both sides of that equation. He is doing terrible harm to the conservative party.

240 posted on 01/10/2002 11:00:18 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-265 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson