Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: College Repub
The calculations come out to be as follows:

The first of the Biblical days lasted 24 hours, viewed from the "beginning of time perspective." But the duration from our perspective was 8 billion years.
The second day, from the Bible's perspective lasted 24 hours. From our perspective it lasted half of the previous day, 4 billion years.
The third day also lasted half of the previous day, 2 billion years.
The fourth day - one billion years.
The fifth day - one-half billion years.
The sixth day - one-quarter billion years.

Is this all really necessary? Point is, the Bible is a great text as to how one should live, but it's not scientific. That's a basic summation. Stop trying to conform the Bible to science, and realize that when the Bible was written, that man didn't know what they know now. The Bible is a moral text. Not a scientific one.

8 posted on 01/09/2002 6:25:00 AM PST by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JediGirl
Stop trying to conform the Bible to science,...

Actually, It looks more like they're trying to make science conform to the Bible.

14 posted on 01/09/2002 7:24:38 AM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: JediGirl
...the Bible is a great text as to how one should live...

So...do YOU live by the text you claim is great?

Or was that like saying that Kwanzaa is a great holiday?

16 posted on 01/10/2002 10:47:18 AM PST by Kyrie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson