Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Theory Suggests Start of Universe
AP via Yahoo! ^ | January 8, 2002 | Paul Recer

Posted on 01/09/2002 5:24:37 AM PST by Darth Reagan

WASHINGTON (AP) - A half billion years of utter blackness following the Big Bang, the theoretical start of the universe, was broken by an explosion of stars bursting into life like a fireworks finale across the heavens, a new theory suggests.

An analysis of very faint galaxies in the deepest view of the universe ever captured by a telescope suggests there was an eruption of stars bursting to life and piercing the blackness very early in the 15-billion year history of the universe.

The study, by Kenneth M. Lanzetta of the State University of New York at Stony Brook challenges the long held belief that star formation started slowly after the Big Bang and didn't peak until some five billion years later.

``Star formation took place early and very rapidly,'' Lanzetta said Tuesday at a NASA (news - web sites) news conference. ``Star formation was ten times higher in the distant early universe than it is today.''

Lanzetta's conclusions are based on an analysis of what is called a deep field study by the Hubble Space Telescope (news - web sites). To capture the faintest and most distant images possible, the Hubble focused on an ordinary bit of sky for more than 14 days, taking a picture of every object within a small, deep slice of the heavens. The resulting images are faint, fuzzy bits of light from galaxies near and far, including some more than 14 billion light years away, said Lanzetta.

The surprise was that the farther back the telescope looked, the greater was the star forming activity.

``Star formation continued to increase to the very earliest point that we could see,'' said Lanzetta. ``We are seeing close to the first burst of star formation.''

Bruce Margon of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore said Lanzetta's conclusions are a ``surprising result'' that will need to be confirmed by other studies.

``This suggests that the great burst of star formation was at the beginning of the universe,'' said Margon, noting that, in effect: ``The finale came first.''

``If this can be verified, it will dramatically change our understanding of the universe,'' said Anne Kinney, director of the astronomy and physics division at NASA.

In his study, Lanzetta examined light captured in the Hubble deep field images using up to 12 different light filters to separate the colors. The intensity of red was used to establish the distance to each point of light. The distances were then used to create a three-dimensional perspective of the 5,000 galaxies in the Hubble picture.

Lanzetta also used images of nearby star fields as a yardstick for stellar density and intensity to conclude that about 90 percent of the light in the very early universe was not detected by the Hubble. When this missing light was factored into the three dimensional perspective, it showed that the peak of star formation came just 500 million years after the Big Bang and has been declining since.

Current star formation, he said, ``is just a trickle'' of that early burst of stellar birth.

Lisa Storrie-Lombardi, a California Institute of Technology astronomer, said that the colors of the galaxies in the Hubble deep field images ``are a very good indication of their distance.''

Current theory suggests that about 15 billion years ago, an infinitely dense single point exploded - the Big Bang - creating space, time, matter and extreme heat. As the universe cooled, light elements, such as hydrogen and helium, formed. Later, some of areas became more dense with elements than others, forming gravitational centers that attracted more and more matter. Eventually, formed celestial bodies became dense enough to start nuclear fires, setting the heavens aglow. These were newborn stars.

Storrie-Lombardi said that current instruments and space telescopes now being planned could eventually, perhaps, see into the Dark Era, the time before there were stars.

``We are getting close to the epoch were we can not see at all,'' she said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last
Here's my question. Assuming that the farthest thing away from us is 14 billion light years distant, and the universe is 15 billion years old, then how fast do stars and other matter have to travel to get that far away? If this object that's 14 billion ly away from us is 7 billion light years from the originating point of the Big Bang, then that matter had to travel at almost half the speed of light to get there. Of course, I'm assuming that this is the maximum distance of any object from us, and I'm not sure that's the case

I've never seen this addressed...maybe my math and assumptions are faulty. Any help?

1 posted on 01/09/2002 5:24:37 AM PST by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Paging. I suspect you may know the answer to my question above.....
2 posted on 01/09/2002 5:26:00 AM PST by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
If this object that's 14 billion ly away from us is 7 billion light years from the originating point of the Big Bang, then that matter had to travel at almost half the speed of light to get there.

The whole universe was contained in the Big Bang. It's not like the debris of an explosion expanding through space, rushing away from some central point. The whole space was once confined to a small point. The whole space is expanding. The Big Bang is everywhere, which is why the Cosmic Microwave Background comes from all over the sky.

3 posted on 01/09/2002 5:31:45 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
"And God said, 'Let there be light'"

'Nuff said.

4 posted on 01/09/2002 5:33:22 AM PST by QueenCityAllan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
So, its about space expanding, not objects moving -- and the objects are "attached" to a certain point in space (and, I suppose, move relative to the universe near their spot of "attachment"). That makes more sense.
5 posted on 01/09/2002 5:33:30 AM PST by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
I don't want to talk about it.
6 posted on 01/09/2002 5:35:45 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
You got it. The recessional velocities come from the expansion of the space itself. There could be things far enough away that they are receding from us at faster than light speed. We will never see such objects, since their spectra are basically red-shifted to zero energy.
7 posted on 01/09/2002 5:37:34 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
I don't know if objects are "attached" to points of space. Rather, the space "within" objects is so small compared to the universe as a whole that the expansion of the space is undectable.
8 posted on 01/09/2002 5:38:51 AM PST by abandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
9 posted on 01/09/2002 5:45:04 AM PST by Andy from Beaverton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
Lanzetta also used images of nearby star fields as a yardstick for stellar density and intensity to conclude that about 90 percent of the light in the very early universe was not detected by the Hubble. When this missing light was factored into the three dimensional perspective, it showed that the peak of star formation came just 500 million years after the Big Bang and has been declining since

Is this what's known in scientific circles as the fudge factor?

10 posted on 01/09/2002 5:45:35 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
What's beyond space?
11 posted on 01/09/2002 5:49:09 AM PST by NC_Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
And God said:

Be light.

12 posted on 01/09/2002 5:51:15 AM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NC_Libertarian
What's beyond space?

You can't get from here to there.

13 posted on 01/09/2002 5:52:28 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
Is that what he's saying? I think objects move through space, even if space is expanding. So are there any theories that space is infinite? Are there boundaries? Or I've heard before that if you travel long enough (a *very* long time of course) in one direction you would end up at your starting point.
14 posted on 01/09/2002 5:52:46 AM PST by NC_Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: QueenCityAllan
Big Bang is compadible with Creation Theory. It's merely a scientific explanation for God's work.
16 posted on 01/09/2002 5:55:38 AM PST by College Repub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: QueenCityAllan
"And God said, 'Let there be light'"

And there was nothing, but it could be seen.

17 posted on 01/09/2002 5:55:59 AM PST by Scally Wag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: QueenCityAllan
God created a reality of natural laws in meticulous balance. It's interesting to ponder.
18 posted on 01/09/2002 5:56:33 AM PST by NC_Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: QueenCityAllan
In fact, the more and more we discover about the origins of the universe and civilization, the more accurate Genesis appears to be. Science and religion go hand in hand.
19 posted on 01/09/2002 5:56:43 AM PST by College Repub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NC_Libertarian
Or I've heard before that if you travel long enough (a *very* long time of course) in one direction you would end up at your starting point.

A lot of truth to what you say here, it happened to me often during a misspent youth.

20 posted on 01/09/2002 5:58:27 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson