Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Exnihilo
I find it odd that people view SETI as an acceptable attempt at discerning intelligence,

Except SETI is looking for a known type of signal that is only generated by artificial means. (Does not require the "God in the gaps" idea).

29 posted on 01/07/2002 4:05:04 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: RadioAstronomer
that is only generated by artificial means

Has this claim been empirically verified? No? Gosh, that's not 'scientific'.
33 posted on 01/07/2002 4:08:26 PM PST by Exnihilo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer
"Except SETI is looking for a known type of signal that is only generated by artificial means."

Hmmm. So RadioAstronomer has an exhaustive list of all possible types of naturally-occurring signals? Wow.

I don't see how this is different from what ID does.

70 posted on 01/07/2002 4:33:16 PM PST by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer
Except SETI is looking for a known type of signal that is only generated by artificial means. (Does not require the "God in the gaps" idea).

There's also that many years ago a signal from space was detected and it was believed that it could only have come from an articifical source. They were called LGMs.

They were renamed "pulsars" after it was discovered that they were actually a type of star -- an example of scientists noting and correcting the mistakes of the past.

Thus if SETI finds something, it will still be subject to intense scrutiny.
113 posted on 01/07/2002 6:25:45 PM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson