[Exnihilo]

Hey, just for fun.. tell me what criterion a theory must meet to be "scientific". It seems to me that for something to be 'scientific' it must be subject to the scientific method, right? But then, in that respect, darwinian evolution as an explaination for biodiversity is "unscientific". So, what exactly do we mean when we say something is "scientific" ?

[VadeRetro]

Isn't ID the "science" of throwing up your hands and saying "I'll never understand this! God must have done it!"

Which is to say, once you accept ID, you'll never learn another thing about the universe. And if that's science, my farts are perfume.