To: Beach_Babe
When multiple witnesses AGREE with each other, their story becomes highly probable. However, I'm not at all sure who to believe in this matter. Against those witnesses is the fact that the tail was found much closer to the aircraft's takeoff point than any other part of the wreckage, which would tend to indicate that it came off first.
22 posted on
01/07/2002 10:52:28 AM PST by
Magician
To: Magician
Against those witnesses is the fact that the tail was found much closer to the aircraft's takeoff point than any other part of the wreckage, which would tend to indicate that it came off first.Or, it could tell you that the tail is very light compared to the rest of the plane. Throw a Kleenex and a rock at the same time out of a moving car and see what happens....
To: Magician
When multiple witnesses AGREE with each other, their story becomes highly probable. However, I'm not at all sure who to believe in this matter. Against those witnesses is the fact that the tail was found much closer to the aircraft's takeoff point than any other part of the wreckage, which would tend to indicate that it came off first. Tail in the bay at approximately Beach 105th Street...
Two 2'x7' Panels on the diner roof at Beach 116th Street...
Wing tip (8 foot) on Beach 125th Street...
Many other parts recovered from all over a large area aside from the crash site at Beach 130th Street...
And now they are reporting fuel/oil in the bay.
Sure seems like the plane was literally falling apart long before it crashed.
A shoe-bomber, maybe?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson