To: madg
Essentially, from that perspective, you are not a person until you are born; and therefore are not entitled to the constitutional rights enjoyed by the populace. Yes, you are defending the serial killing of womb-bound infants who have been proven to be conscious and aware, able to learn and even dreaming on occasion while still in the womb. At least we've cut throught to the heart of your position now. So I ask you, should it be legal to practice serial killing of womb-bound infants, whether you defend it as a 'reproductive right' or other? This entire debate is over whether it is right, not whether it is a protected behavior. Is serial killing of individual human beings right, in the interest of the convenience or empowerment or whatever you want to defend? ... With the exception of killing the infant to save the woman's life, which I believe should be her choice ... some women have risked the doctor's advice to kill their unborn to prevent possible death to her(the mother) and have lived to cherish their little ones.
69 posted on
01/09/2002 6:23:04 PM PST by
MHGinTN
To: MHGinTN
There is a constant theme running through madg's posts, and that is that his/ her perspective is the only one that matters. It stands out.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson