Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TopQuark
So how come we first "invent" an area of mathematics and only subsequently "discover" that it describers Nature

I would argue that historically this is not the order of these two events. It is only recently that a few obscure areas of mathematics have been shown to have physical "manifestations". For instance, I read recently about an example involving the Banach-Tarski paradox.

137 posted on 01/07/2002 2:04:01 PM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Really? From Euclidean geometry to Rimannian. How about the classical and variational calculi?

I am not sure why you refer to Banach-Tarski. These things, as far as I understand stem from the Axiom of Choice and should not be THAT surprising: once you accept it, you are stuck, for instance, with non-measurable sets.

154 posted on 01/07/2002 2:30:32 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson